• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Home Solar Resiliency

    July 20th, 2018
    preparedness, solar  [html]
    Lots of houses around here have solar panels on their roofs, due to a combination of subsidies, falling solar costs, and high electric prices. You might think this would be really good to have if something went wrong and we had an extended power outage, but standard residential solar doesn't give you any power when the grid is down.

    I'm looking at putting solar on our house, and I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense to go with something that would be more useful in an extended blackout. There seem to be more or less three options:

    • Default: no off-grid capability.

    • Secure power supply (SPS): an outlet in the basement that gives you power when the grid is down and the sun is shining.

    • Batteries: storage and the ability to switch the whole house over to run off them.

    Talking to solar people and looking online, it doesn't sound like it's possible to have an intermediate option where the whole house has power, but only when the sun is shining. I don't really understand why this can't be done with an interlock, but that's what they say.

    An SPS is only a bit more expensive [1], while a system with batteries looks like it would be about $10k. We could also do something in between, like charging a UPS or other batteries from an SPS and using it to power things when the sun was down. In general it seems like a potentially useful tool for combining with other things. Have others thought much about it?

    A big question here is how likely we would be to need something like this. Guessing, maybe over the 25 year life of the system there's a ~5% chance we have a blackout lasting more than a week and a ~2% chance that we have one lasting more than a month? I think at these odds it's worth it to get the SPS, some long extension cords, and maybe a UPS, but not worth it to get a full off-grid-capable-with-batteries system?


    [1] Most inverters don't have one, but SMA's do. Which means it's restricting inverter choice rather than directly costing more. Call it $250?

    Comment via: google plus, facebook, hacker news

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Austerity is Inefficient

    Working on an emergency timetable for regional rail has made it clear how an environment of austerity requires tradeoffs that reduce efficiency. I already talked about how the Swiss electronics before concrete slogan is not about not spending money but ab…

    via Pedestrian Observations February 27, 2021

    Fireside Friday, February 26, 2021

    Fireside this week, but next week we are diving into our long awaited series on pre-modern textile production, though we will be particularly focused on the most important clothing fibers in the Mediterranean world, wool and linen (rather than, say, silk …

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry February 26, 2021

    The Troubling Ethics of Writing (A Speech from Ancient Sumer)

    (Translated from a transcript of an ancient Sumerian speech by Uruk's most well-respected Scriptological Ethicist) Writing is a profoundly dangerous technology: Access to writing was initially, and still remains, uneven. What's worse, the rich are m…

    via BLOG - Cullen O'Keefe February 15, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact