• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Paying With Donations

    January 23rd, 2013
    ideas, money  [html]
    If I plan to donate $X this year, it doesn't actually matter that it comes directly from me. What matters is that it's money going to the organization of my choice that they wouldn't otherwise get. So when my employer matches money I give, I count that the same as if I had given the additional money myself. [1]

    Which means people can use this to pay each other. If I want to pay you $100 I can give $100 to a charity of your choice. You count that as a donation you're making, I count it as ordinary spending. If you look at my donations page you can see that I've done this a few times, accepting a donation in my name in place of payment.

    (If this became popular you could have charities generate unique receipts, so that someone couldn't "pay" both Xavier and Yolanda with the same $Z donation to charity W, but so far I've only done this with people I trust not to rip me off.)

    Update 2014-02-24: I still think this is a good idea, but I'm less enthusiastic about it than I was. The big problem is that it makes your actions less legible and harder to explain. If I say "I gave $X" that's clear, but if it's "I claim moral responsibility for donating $X, including $Y that I donated directly and $Z that other people gave on my behalf as a kind of payment" I need to explain a lot of background.


    [1] In fact, if I could move money from my salary to my employer donation match I would. Money you donate to charity counts as if you hadn't earned it for federal income tax purposes, but there are lots of other taxes including state income tax, social security, etc, so if the money goes to charity without ever legally being yours that's better. Not that I fully understand taxes.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    It's ok to feed stray cats

    Before we had kids, Jeff and I fostered a couple of cats. One had feline AIDS and was very skinny. Despite our frugal grocery budget of the time, I put olive oil on her food, determined to get her healthier. I knew that stray cats were not a top global pr…

    via Giving Gladly May 15, 2021

    Collections: Teaching Paradox, Europa Universalis IV, Part III: Europa Provincalis

    This is the third part of our series (I, II) examining the historical assumptions of Paradox Interactive’s grand strategy computer game set in the early modern period, Europa Universalis IV (which is in turn the start of a yet larger series looking at sev…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry May 14, 2021

    Randal O’Toole Gets High-Speed Rail Wrong

    Now that there’s decent chance of US investment in rail, Randal O’Toole is resurrecting his takes from the early Obama era, warning that high-speed rail is a multi-trillion dollar money sink. It’s not a good analysis, and in particular it gets the reality…

    via Pedestrian Observations May 12, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact