::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact

What Discount Rate do we Apply to Giving?

August 24th, 2010
money, house, giving  [html]
Giving $1000 to oxfam today would be better than giving $1001 in a year, but $1000 today would probably be worse than $2000 in a year. I'm not sure what the transition point is. $1050? $1100? $1500? There is some amount, which really is the same as an interest rate, at which it would make more sense for us to invest the money and later give to oxfam than to give to them now. The more effective we think oxfam is at creating structural solutions that continue to help people without additional spending, the more important it is to us to give money sooner, and the better an investment would have to be to induce us to chose it instead. Their community finance programs, when working effectively, let people start small businesses and get out of poverty. This affects not just them, but their children and community. So there definitely needs to be some discount rate, because money spent now can have lasting effects.

In considering buying a house, we might defer giving for a while until we've paid off the mortgage. If so, we'd charge ourselves interest on the money we were delaying giving to oxfam. How much interest would that be? If it would be at a rate higher than the current mortgage rate, we would do better to take a longer mortgage (30 year), make just the minimum payments, and give away as much as we could. So what we choose for this discount rate matters some. It also matters because if Julia thinks we chose the rate incorrectly then she might either resist or encourage delaying so oxfam can get more money.

I have no idea how to decide what a good discount rate is. Julia's not sure either. I could ask oxfam.

Comment via: facebook

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Let it flow

You can’t micromanage flow. It’s when your thoughts, feelings, and insights are flowing. If you try to slow down a river and tell every water molecule exactly where it goes, what you’ll have is a block of ice.

via Holly Elmore February 18, 2020

China Won’t Save You

The construction costs of Britain’s just-approved domestic high-speed rail network, High Speed 2, are extreme. The headline costs are, in 2019 figures, £80.7-88.7 billion per the Oakervee review, with one estimate going up to £106.6 billion, all for a sys…

via Pedestrian Observations February 17, 2020

95%-ile isn't that good

Reaching 95%-ile isn't very impressive because it's not that hard to do. I think this is one of my most ridiculable ideas. It doesn't help that, when stated nakedly, that sounds elitist. But I think it's just the opposite: most people can …

via Posts on Dan Luu February 7, 2020

more     (via openring)

More Posts:


  ::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact