|April 16th, 2020|
Set up the board as normal.
Each player controls two colors. We did white/blue and red/orange.
Placement is A B B' A' A' B' B A
Turns aren't color specific, except that you can only build for one color on a turn.
If you own a port with either color you can fully use it on your turn.
Development cards are color specific, which really only matters for the 1 VP cards
Each player has one hand, and the robber limit is 14 instead of 7. Possibly this should be more like ten or even seven.
The game still ends when one color gets to 10 VP, but the goal is to not come in last. Whichever player has the color with the fewest VP at the end of the game loses. The player who got to 10 VP first wins ties.
Trading is allowed, I guess, though since the game is zero-sum you wouldn't actually trade with each other.
Hands are open, not to facilitate trading but to make the strategy more interesting by letting you better model your opponent.
We played two games, but stopped the first one very early on. We agreed that one of us had an 80% chance of winning and so counted it as 80% of a win. Like a doubling cube this helps concentrate your time onto interesting games.
I enjoyed playing, though I don't know how many more games of it I'd like to play. In generally I enjoy the dynamic of games with more people a lot more, though under the current circumstances that's not always practical. It has less waiting than regular Catan, which is a plus.
I think the 36-card variant ("gamblers fallacy dice") would help here a lot more than in regular Catan, since otherwise the game can get unbalanced quickly due to quirks of the die. In general I like the way the card variant adds strategy, especially if it's easy for the players to tell what cards are yet to come.
Because there's no trading, ports are a lot more important than in a regular game. David picked a port-heavy strategy while I went for variety, and (n=1) ports works better.
After playing I looked around for other sets of two-player rules and there are a lot of variants out there! I haven't looked through them in detail to figure out whether I like this one best.
Comment via: facebook, lesswrong