• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Superintelligence Risk Project

    July 3rd, 2017
    airisk, giving  [html]
    I've decided to make a larger project out of looking into AI risk. I don't think we really know why there's such a disconnect between people who think we should strongly prioritize it and the mainstream ML perspective that it's not useful to work on (at least not currently). I've applied for an EA grant, and am thinking I'll spend about a month on this.

    Here's where I currently am:

    • I've read nearly all of the reading people suggested (by number of words) or about two thirds of it (by individual pieces). This is mostly an effect of Superintelligence being very long.

    • I've had conversations with one person in each camp, have a few more scheduled, and am working on lining up more.

    Here are some very preliminary thoughts on where I think the disagreement might be:

    • How likely is it that current approaches are all we need for AGI, with relatively straightforward extensions and a lot of scaling?

    • How valuable is it to work on solving problems that are probably not the right ones? For example, even if we think AGI will not look like current systems, might trying to solve the control problem for current systems teach us enough about the underlying problem and how to do this kind of work that we'll be in a better position once we see more what AGI will actually look like?

    • How useful is it to have a strong theoretical foundation, vs just understanding the technology enough from an engineering perspective that we can make it do things for us?

    • How similar is this to normal engineering? How much should we expect companies' desires that their AI systems do what they want them to do to work out?

    • As we get closer to AGI, how likely is the ML community to take superintelligence risk seriously? Is it just that they don't think it can be productively worked on now or do they not think it will ever be a real problem?

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact