### Shortcuts With Chained Probabilities

February 17th, 2021
math
Let's say you're considering an activity with a risk of death of one in a million. If you do it twice, is your risk two in a million?

Technically, it's just under:

```1 - (1 - 1/1,000,000)^2 = ~2/1,000,001
```
This is quite close! Approximating `1 - (1-p)^2` as `p*2` was only off by 0.00005%.

On the other hand, say you roll a die twice looking for a 1:

```1 - (1 - 1/6)^2 = ~31%
```
The approximation would have given:
```1/6 * 2 = ~33%
```
Which is off by 8%. And if we flip a coin looking for a tails:
```1/2 * 2 = 100%
```
Which is clearly wrong since you could get heads twice in a row.

It seems like this shortcut is better for small probabilities; why?

If something has probability `p`, then the chance of it happening at least once in two independent tries is:

```1 - (1-p)^2
= 1 - (1 - 2p + p^2)
= 1 - 1 + 2p - p^2
= 2p - p^2
```
If `p` is very small, then `p^2` is negligible, and `2p` is only a very slight overestimate. As it gets larger, however, skipping it becomes more of a problem.

This is the calculation that people do when adding micromorts: you can't die from the same thing multiple times, but your chance of death stays low enough that the inaccuracy of naively combining these probabilities is much smaller than the margin of error on our estimates.

### Recent posts on blogs I like:

#### Ideological Abuse, Busyness, and the Importance of Rest

ONE WEIRD TRICK to protect yourself against cults

via Thing of Things June 18, 2024

#### A discussion of discussions on AI bias

There've been regular viral stories about ML/AI bias with LLMs and generative AI for the past couple years. One thing I find interesting about discussions of bias is how different the reaction is in the LLM and generative AI case when compared to "…

via Posts on June 16, 2024

#### Conversations I often have about parenting

Topics that come up a lot The post Conversations I often have about parenting appeared first on Otherwise.

via Otherwise June 4, 2024