• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Narrow band television

    October 15th, 2009
    tech  [html]
    About a week ago I thought: a computer sound card can do digital to analogue conversion very well. A computer generally doesn't have an analogue video out port. Could one use the sound card for this? It turns out that this is possible to some extent, but not what I was hoping. The main problem is that standard television signals are high bandwidth, which means that we need a much higher sampling rate than a sound card does. A sound card gives you 44.1 thousand samples per second, but to do full tv at the standard 30 frames a second we need about 150 times that many samples. So anything that works is going to need to be a lot lower quality.

    There are two options for trading off quality: you can show smaller frames or fewer frames. It looks like people have done both. These are both technically "Narrow Band Television", but generally the former gets this name and the latter is called "Slow Scan Television". Narrow band is how television started, with very small pictures at full speed. SSTV is more recent, being used by ham radio operators to send primarily still pictures. Both of these are within reach of a sound card and can be done.

    For hooking a computer up to a modern but analogue television, SSTV would definitely not work for several reasons. The biggest is that the phosphor on the tv needs to be refreshed very often, and at several seconds a frame the top half of the screen would be long dark by the time the bottom half was drawn. It also seems that while the NTSC format does say the TV needs to sync up to the video input signal, that's mostly for fine correction. Sending the sync signals at a speed 1/150th or so of what was expected by the TV designers is unlikely to work.

    Narrow band TV is also not likely to work, but has a greater chance of working. If we can send the syncs proprly, we ought to be able to get it to jump back to the top of the screen after only sending 15 lines or so. This would let us draw a small image, though it would be way stretched. The problem, I think, is that we would need to send the sync signals with greater resolution than we can manage with a sound card.

    Update: 2009-11-26. Blake writes to give a link to using a vga card to generate DVB-T signals. Unlike an audio signal, a vga signal does have high enough bandwidth to display proper images. You need a card that can do 4096x2048 at exactly 76.5 MHz. Hmm.

    Comment via: facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    What should we do about network-effect monopolies?

    Many large companies today are software monopolies that give their product away for free to get monopoly status, then do horrible things. Can we do anything about this?

    via benkuhn.net July 5, 2020

    More on the Deutschlandtakt

    The Deutschlandtakt plans are out now. They cover investment through 2040, but even beforehand, there’s a plan for something like a national integrated timetable by 2030, with trains connecting the major cities every 30 minutes rather than hourly. But the…

    via Pedestrian Observations July 1, 2020

    How do cars fare in crash tests they're not specifically optimized for?

    Any time you have a benchmark that gets taken seriously, some people will start gaming the benchmark. Some famous examples in computing are the CPU benchmark specfp and video game benchmarks. With specfp, Sun managed to increase its score on 179.art (a su…

    via Posts on Dan Luu June 30, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact