• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • The 'expand this here' * operator in python

    September 29th, 2009
    programming, python, tech
    The python docs (2.6.2) say this about the use of *:
    5.3.4:

    If the syntax *expression appears in the function call, expression must evaluate to a sequence. Elements from this sequence are treated as if they were additional positional arguments; if there are positional arguments x1,..., xN, and expression evaluates to a sequence y1, ..., yM, this is equivalent to a call with M+N positional arguments x1, ..., xN, y1, ..., yM

    7.6:

    If the * is present [in the function definition argument list], it is initialized to a tuple receiving any excess positional parameters, defaulting to the empty tuple
    This is very handy, but is also limited. In python 3.0, PEP 3132 added some related syntax:
    first, *rest = seq
    a, *b, c = range(5)
    This is again, handy but limited. This star syntax only works in these two cases: functions (star-args) and assignment targets. There are logical extensions that make a lot of sense to me, though. If one can do:
    first, *rest = seq
    then I want to be able to do:
    seq = first, *rest
    While the following is ambiguous and so clearly needs to be illegal:
    first, *some, *rest = seq
    this is not ambiguous:
    seq = first, *some, *rest
    While we're at it, lets make the following legal:
    foo(first, *some, *rest)
    All these changes together would make for a very consistent and powerful interpretation of * as 'expand this sequence here'.

    Update 2013-04-05: Danner points out a 2008 patch. This was put on hold because of the moratotium (to "allow non-CPython implementations to 'catch up'") but with 3.3 out I think the moratorium is over. I just poked the bug.

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Rereading Roald Dahl

    Taking out a few words doesn't change much. The post Rereading Roald Dahl appeared first on Otherwise.

    via Otherwise March 25, 2023

    What does Bing Chat tell us about AI risk?

    Early signs of catastrophic risk? Yes and no.

    via Cold Takes February 28, 2023

    Why Neighborhoods Should Have Speed Bumps

    I have several reasons I think why neighborhoods should have speed bumps. First, speed bumps are very useful to stop cars from hitting people in the streets. Second, when construction workers installed speed bumps on the street in front of our house it was v…

    via Lily Wise's Blog Posts February 27, 2023

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact