• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Instrument Complexity and Automation

    December 29th, 2011
    music  [html]
    Looking at instruments from their specs, the piano sounds like it should be optimal: it has a huge range, the keys keep you in tune, you can play multiple notes at once, and each note requires little effort. Why doesn't everyone play the piano? Well, it's heavy and can only sound like a string instrument, but there are good keyboards now that are light and can sound like anything you want: why do we still have so many other instruments?

    The problem with the piano or keyboard is that you've traded off a lot of expressiveness for capability. A pianist can choose how hard to hit a key, which changes how the string sounds when it is struck, but that's really it. [1] A violinist, however, can control the vibration of the string continuously, being much closer to directly manipulating it.

    This is a tradeoff we see all over the place: a concertina is easier and faster to play than a harmonica, but it has limited control over the sound. The penny whistle and flute, harpsicord and the harp, bombarde and bagpipe; they all follow this pattern. People didn't stop playing the violin after the invention of keyed fiddles, and not just because they're complex and expensive: the farther you get from directly manipulating the sound, the more control you give up and the more your sound is limited. [2]

    Seeing this relationship eveywhere, I decided to make some charts. They show, for a kind of instrument, what possibilities there are as you make different tradeoffs on complexity, cost, automation, and capablity. Consider the free reeds:

    The jaw harp player, while limited to a single note, has incredible options for percussion and harmonic shapings. The harmonica trades off some of these options for many more notes, while retaining some control over how each note sounds. With the melodica we give up even that texture control, but get something much easier to play.

    I made a few more:

    The idea is that each instrument is categorized as branching off another that had the musician closer to the creation of the sound. As I made it, however, I realised that some branches added capabiltities without any real tradeoffs (bugle to trumpet). So this doesn't explain everything.

    The full set, including others I didn't draw:

      no holes end blown flute
        pan pipes
          pipe organ
        kaval
        no holes fipple flute
          slide whistle
          recorder, penny whistle
            pipe organ
        fife, wood flute
          concert flute
    
      shawm
        crumhorn
          bagpipe
        oboe
    
      jaw harp
        harmonica
          melodica
            concertina, accordion
            reed organ
    
      didgeridoo
        bugle
          trumpet, tuba
          trombone
    
      bell
        xylophone
          toy piano
    
      water glass
        glass harp
          glass harmonica
    
      hornpipe
        chalumeau
          clarinet
            saxophone
    
      berimbau
        harp
          zither
            autoharp
            harpsicord
            psaltery
            mountain dulcimer
          hammered dulcimer
            piano
        diddley bow
          violin, viola, cello, bass
            guitar, mandolin, ukelele, bass guitar
            viola de amor
              nyckelharpa
                hurdey gurdey
        washtub bass
          erhu
    
    

    Update 2013-11-19: The viola organista is another instrument that belongs on this chart. It's a bowed string instrument, where pitch is chosen by selecting from among appropriately tuned strings. It should probably go under the bowed psaltery.

    [1] This is reflected in MIDI: a note is defined as a note (0-127) and a velocity (0-127), followed by, some time later, an 'end of note' command. (There are also aftertouch, channel pressure, and pitch bend messages, but your standard midi keyboard doesn't generate them.)

    [2] This sounds negative, but I don't mean it that way. The tradeoffs can be good ones: I like that my mandolin has frets because it makes chords much more practical to play in tune. I use a pick because I can play much faster. I like my penny whistle because I'ven't learned how to shape my mouth to play flute.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook, r/WeAreTheMusicMakers

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact