• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Hybrid Lottery Admission

    October 7th, 2019
    beantownstomp, contra  [html]
    Last year we organized a new contra dance weekend, Beantown Stomp (retrospective). It sold out, and some people were frustrated that they didn't hear about it before we went to a waitlist. Since we're going to have a second one (March 20-22nd, put it in your calendar!) several people have suggested that we do a lottery this year. Looking at last years applications, however, I'm not so sure:

    We admitted people first-come first-served and went to waitlist at the end of February for a weekend in late March. Everyone who applied before the weekend did end up getting in off the waitlist for at least part of it, though there were also people who would have liked to come who didn't try registering because they knew the weekend was sold out.

    This year we're going to allow more people to attend, 250 instead of 200: there was no time last year where the hall was too full, and my worries about not being able to ventilate well enough were unfounded. So there should be less pressure on tickets, with more of them to go around.

    So instead of jumping right in with a lottery, here's what I'm thinking: when we open registration the first 125 applications are accepted. Then if we get application #126 before registration has been open for a month, we pause registration and hold a lottery for the remaining 125 spots. This keeps the simplicity and immediacy of first-come first-served, unless demand is high enough that we need a lottery.

    Thoughts? I don't know of other events that have done this: most have stayed first-come first-served until they start seeing all their tickets selling out right away, and then switched to a lottery. The hybrid proposal here is a way to get most of the benefits of both when you don't know which situation you're in yet.

    Comment via: facebook, lesswrong

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact