Contra Events Pairing Callers By Age?

April 24th, 2026
contra
A friend observed a pattern where contra dance events seem to be pairing older and younger callers. I looked over my notes for two-caller events in 2025 and saw [1]:

  • Two older callers: 33 events
  • One of each: 30 events
  • Two younger callers: 4 events

Seems pretty clear evidence of pairing, no? But this actually turns out to be what you'd expect to see if organizers ignored age.

With 67 two-caller events there are 134 slots. Of these, 96 (72%) went to older callers and 38 (28%) went to younger ones. So there are four possibilities:

caller 1 older caller 1 younger
caller 2 older 72% * 72% 28% * 72%
caller 2 younger 72% * 28% 28% * 28%

This gives us:

  • Two older callers: 34 events (72% * 72%), vs 33 observed
  • One of each: 27 events (72% * 28% + 28% * 72%), vs 30 observed
  • Two younger callers: 5 events (28% * 28%), vs 4 observed

While this is very slightly in the direction you'd expect if organizers preferred to match different-age callers, it's well within what you could get by chance. It looks to me like this is just "two moderately rare events both happening is very rare."

We can compare this to the situation with gender, where you consistently get male-female pairs more often than you'd expect by chance:

The biggest caveat, though, is that this is based on a count of just one year's bookings. If I had more time, I'd like to go back over all the past data and count, but I really don't.


[1] Age is continuous, so this bucketing is somewhat arbitrary. Since most callers are either baby boomers or millennials, though, I do think there are two meaningful groups. I also don't know how old almost anyone actually is, so am just guessing from appearance.

Comment via: facebook, lesswrong, mastodon, bluesky

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Let's Taboo the V-Word

Read this post on Substack.

via Home July 12, 2026

Thing of Things AI use policy

dynomight recently wrote an article calling for bloggers to state publicly whether and how they use AI

via Thing of Things July 6, 2026

Agentic test processes, LLM benchmarks, and other notes on agentic coding from Galapagos Island

I've been using AI fairly heavily since last November and the whole thing is a funny experience. An agent will do something that, if a human did it, you'd immediately fire them. My reaction, of course, is to act as if this is great and spin up a t…

via Posts on July 3, 2026

more     (via openring)