• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Breast-style Bottle Nipples

    December 31st, 2013
    baby, food, ideas, kids  [html]
    The skills a baby needs to take milk from a breast are not the same ones they need for a bottle. So if you try and use both the baby can have "nipple confusion" where they apply the methods for one kind of nipple to the other, getting upset instead of milk. The recommendation is that if you want to breastfeed your baby that you not use bottle-feeding at all, even with pumped breast milk, until as late as possible. This isn't ideal, as it means that the mother has to be near the baby basically all the time, and no one can watch the baby for them for more than an hour or two. So why don't we make bottles that require the same actions from the baby that a breast does, allowing easy substitution between the two?

    This is something people have tried to make, but so far they haven't succeeded. Remaining differences appear to be:

    • Bottles require a constant amount of suction to produce milk, which can be high or low depending on the design, but breasts require an initial high level followed by a lower level.
    • Bottles generally don't deform at all, and even the ones designed to deform don't do it in the same way as breasts.

    This appears to be enough of a problem that no bottle currently on the market is interchangable with a breast from the infant's prespective, but I don't see why it needs to stay that way. What's keeping manufacturers from producing bottles that take all of these into account?

    (You might think that part of the problem is that each person's breasts are different and so you can't design a single bottle that will mimic everyone's, but I haven't found anyone talking about nipple confusion in cases where the same child is nursed by multiple people. So it seems like breasts are similar enough to each other that one bottle sould be able to work for everyone.)

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact