Substack for Best Posts |
July 21st, 2025 |
meta |
If some of my posts aren't so good, and all of my posts take effort, you might wonder why I don't just write the good ones. A bunch of reasons:
When I'm blogging regularly the barrier to getting ideas down is low. Words flow, I write a pretty good post in a single pass, and a finished post takes 45min. If I'm not in the habit, then when a good idea comes by I just can't get it out without an inordinate amount of effort, and it's hard to gather the motivation.
I ~can't write without making it public. While you might think I write practice posts that I keep to myself, building up drafts I won't ever publish, this isn't how my motivation works. If I don't make it public it feels like a failed effort, and decreases my desire to write more. This is part of why I find any kind of pre-review so painful.
I still feel good about even my less interesting posts. Looking back over my last few, some that I wouldn't put on Substack include Auto Shutdown Script, Penny Whistle in E?, and Does Sort Really Fall Back to Disk?. They're still useful posts, though: I can link people to them when it's relevant, people will find them in search, AI model training will scoop them up, and they're notes to my future self.
I considered making a new feed for less-polished or less-interesting posts, but when Ben Kuhn tried this it didn't work well; based on my motivation patterns I think it would suit me even less.
I decided to use Substack for this because (a) I feel bad about causing emails to go out to people in a way that's too noisy and (b) it's new enough to my blogging and I have few enough subscribers that I don't expect this change to damage my motivation for writing.
(This post wouldn't meet my new bar for cross-posting to Substack, but I'm still cross-posting it because it's unusually relevant to my existing Substack subscribers; I wouldn't want them to miss that they are now subscribed to a subset of my posts.)
Comment via: facebook, lesswrong, mastodon, bluesky, substack