• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Recordable and Unrecordable Pleasures

    November 29th, 2010
    recording  [html]
    I enjoy reading books, watching movies, and listening to cds very differently from talking, dancing, or playing music. When I can participate, or even when I'm paying attention with the option to participate, I perceive the activity differently. One reason reading old blog posts or reddit comments is strange is that I'm encountering something that I usually see as participatory but in this case is frozen, the people whose words I'm reading appear to be eager to continue the discussion but in fact have moved on, lost interest, and may no longer share the beliefs they were so excited about.

    When I approach something as frozen and fixed, I am much less excited about it. The possibility of asking a question in a lecture, even if I never ask anything, forces me to actually understand the evidence and arguments in a way that I'll lazily avoid when watching a recorded one. When I'm reading a book I either fall into an "accept everything" mode or I need to be constantly thinking about how I would argue with the author [1]. (This can annoy other people in the room who might prefer to do whatever they were doing without the constant interruptions.)


    [1] I'm currently reading, influence by robert cialdini, which I encountered positive references to on less wrong. One statement that particularly bugged me was:

    just after placing a bet, [gamblers] are much more confident of their horse's chances of winning than they are immediately before laying down the bet. (p57; chapter 3's first sentence)

    I believe that gamblers might talk as if they are more confident then, but if they really were more confident, wouldn't they keep buying tickets? If the bookie's odds are 5-1 and I originally put the horses chances of winning at 25%, I might place a $10 bet. But if the placing of that bet caused me to up my estimate of its chances to 40%, might I think it would make sense to bet another $10? My guess is that if you set up an experiment where you asked gamblers if they wanted to make additional bets, they mostly would not, even though they would report increased confidence. So it's not real confidence.

    Comment via: facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Some reasons to work on productivity and velocity

    A common topic of discussion among my close friends is where the bottlenecks are in our productivity and how we can execute more quickly. This is very different from what I see in my extended social circles, where people commonly say that velocity doesn…

    via Posts on Dan Luu October 15, 2021

    EDT with updating double counts

    I recently got confused thinking about the following case: Calculator bet: I am offered the opportunity to bet on a mathematical statement X to which I initially assign 50% probability (perhaps X = 139926 is a quadratic residue modulo 314159). I have acce…

    via The sideways view October 12, 2021

    Meditations on newborns

    [Content: death.]I wrote most of this a couple of months ago when Nora was a newborn, but the first few months are not that conducive to finishing blog posts. New babies put you into a liminal period, both in your own experience and in how others treat yo…

    via The whole sky October 3, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact