• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Hexagonal Keyboard Layout Survey

    October 9th, 2016
    music  [html]
    The piano keyboard is surprisingly poplar for how awkward it is. It puts all the keys into effectively a single row, which means you often need to move your fingers a very long way:

    A four foot single-row keyboard is kind of nuts. We could get it down to 3.5 feet or 3 feet by going from piano key spacing (23mm) to accordion (20mm, or 18mm for a "ladies model") but that's still pretty big. [1] Putting in multiple rows for multiple octaves, however, can adramatically increase how many notes are under your fingers:

    It turns out there are quite a few systems for laying out notes onto a hexagonal grid like this, so here's a survey of which instruments use which systems. I'm only looking at isomorphic keyboards, which are key-independent.

    Chromatic Button Accordion

    Chromatic button accordions have two main layouts, B-system (Moscow system) and C-system (Western system):
    B-type
             D   F   Ab  B   D   F   Ab  B
          F#  A   C   Eb  F#  A   C   Eb
        E   G   Bb  Db  E   G   Bb  Db
      D   F   Ab  B   D   F   Ab  B
    C   Eb  F#  A   C   Eb  F#  A
                 [hand]
    
    C-type
            E   G   Bb  Db  E   G   Bb  Db
          Eb  F#  A   C   Eb  F#  A   C
        D   F   Ab  B   D   F   Ab  B
      Db  E   G   Bb  Db  E   G   Bb
    C   Eb  F#  A   C   Eb  F#  A
                 [hand]
    

    Both of them have increments of 1.5 steps horizontally, half steps along one diagonal and whole steps along the other diagonal. To tell them apart from looking, a B-system keyboard will have the river of black keys angled up to the right while the C-system will have it angled up to the left. Only three rows are necessary to get all the notes, but by repeating the first two rows fingering options are much improved. On the C-type pitch goes up as you move to the right, rising an octave every four buttons, and the B-type is the mirror image.

    (I'm wondering what A-type was? Maybe something key-dependent?)

    Accordions using these layouts are often just called "chromatic button accordions", but specific regional types include the Bayan and Schrammel.

    Wicki-Hayden

    The Wicki-Hayden layout was traditionally used for concertinas, though it wasn't one of the most popular layouts, and has recently been a popular choice for people designing new instruments.
      G   A   B   Db  Eb  F   G
    C   D   E   F#  Ab  Bb  C
      G   A   B   Db  Eb  F   G
    C   D   E   F#  Ab  Bb  C
      G   A   B   Db  Eb  F   G
    C   D   E   F#  Ab  Bb  C
             [hand]
    
    It has whole steps along each row, fourths on one diagonal and fifths on the other. Pitch goes up as you move toward the top, rising an octave every two rows.

    Harmonic Table

    The harmonic table layout is another one popular among people making electronic instruments, and was also used on the Harmonetta.
            C   E   Ab  C   E   Ab  C
          Eb  G   B   Eb  G   B   Eb
        F#  Bb  D   F#  Bb  D   F#
      A   Db  F   A   Db  F   A
    C   E   Ab  C   E   Ab  C
              [hand]
    
    It has 2 steps along each row, 1.5 steps along one diagonal, and fifths along the other diagonal. Pitch goes up as you move toward the right, rising one octave every three keys. Often it's rotated so that the fifths run vertically instead.

    Janko

    The Janko layout was designed for pianos and is:
      Db  Eb  F   G   A   B   D
    C   D   E   F#  Ab  Bb  C
      Db  Eb  F   G   A   B   D
    C   D   E   F#  Ab  Bb  C
              [hand]
    
    It runs whole-steps along each row and each diagonal is a half-step. Pitch goes up as you move to the right, rising one octave every six keys, which means it's not much of a compactness improvement over a regular piano.

    Fifths

    I don't see anyone proposing making something laid out like a violin or mandolin but it seems pretty practical:
              B   C   Db  D   Eb  E   F
            E   F   F#  G   Ab  A   Bb
          A   Bb  B   C   Db  D   Eb
        D   Eb  E   F   F#  G   Ab
      G   Ab  A   Bb  B   C   Db
    C   Db  D   Eb  E   F   F#
    
    Pitch goes up as you move up and to the right, with half steps along the rows, and fifths up on the right diagonal. The left diagonal is the flat fifth, which isn't especially useful musically, but is half an octave in a way that gets you an interesting pattern.

    The main advantages is this would be easy to switch to from violin/mandolin, plus we already know they work well for people in practice. They're equivalent to playing with no open strings, though, which takes some getting used to, and is more awkward, which suggests something simliar built around fourths (like a bass) would work better:

              Db  D   Eb  E   F
            Ab  A   Bb  B   C
          Eb  E   F   F#  G
        Bb  B   C   Db  D
      F   F#  G   Ab  A
    C   Db  D   Eb  E
    

    Octaves

    And, just for completeness, let's take this to the extreme of just stacking the octaves:
            C   Db  D   Eb  E   F   F#  G   Ab  A   Bb  B
          C   Db  D   Eb  E   F   F#  G   Ab  A   Bb  B
        C   Db  D   Eb  E   F   F#  G   Ab  A   Bb  B
      C   Db  D   Eb  E   F   F#  G   Ab  A   Bb  B
    C   Db  D   Eb  E   F   F#  G   Ab  A   Bb  B
    
    Pitch rises to the right and up, with an octave every row. I don't think this would actually be a good layout, I just want to compare it to the others in the section below.

    Summary

    In terms of getting more notes in a smaller space these different options trade off width and length. Here's a table showing how many rows it takes to move an octave:
    Piano 7
    Janko 6
    Chromatic Accordion 4
    Harmonic Table 3
    Fourths 2.7 (cross-angle)
    Wicki-Hayden 2 (cross-angle)
    Fifths 1.91 (cross-angle)
    Octaves 0.96 (cross-angle)
    All of these except the Janko dramatically reduce how much space it takes to move octaves because they make much better use of being two dimensional. On the other hand, the octaves layout probably goes too far in that direction, which makes me wonder which other ones do as well. The most widely used layout here for real musicians playing keys/buttons is, I think, the chromatic accordion. But wide use only tells you that something is workable; as the piano demonstrates it doesn't show that it's good! Still, if I were going to put effort into learning one of these systems I think I would learn that one.

    (As far as I can tell, you can't actually buy something like this to play with. What I want is a set of velocity-sensitive keys laid out in a hex grid to play with, though I could consider something like a breath controller plus the right hand button setup from a midi accordion like the Roland FR-7xb. The Axis-49 looks like what I want, except it's discontinued and I can't find used ones anywhere.)

    Update 2018-05-15: This came up at work today, and after saying how sad I was that they weren't available I looked again and found a used Axis-49. Ordered! There are two more if you're interested in getting one too. It's harmonic table by default, but I'll need to decide what layout I want to use.


    [1] Unfortunately keyboards with narrower keys are all either very expensive or junky. [1] I think part of what's going on is that physically small instruments are a way for manufacturers to save money, so people making nice instruments and looking for nice instruments have "full sized keys" as a checkbox. That, and experienced players being very used to the standard spacing and not interested in switching.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact