• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Fire Law Incentives

    July 22nd, 2021
    fire, policy  [html]
    Pacific Gas & Electric is planning to spend $15-30b to bury power lines. I see why they're doing it: PG&E equipment sparked some of the worst fires in California history, including the 2018 Camp Fire which destroyed Paradise, but I'm not convinced that this is good for California overall.

    Historically, the area used to burn periodically. We haven't allowed this for about a century, and flammable materials have been building up. It's all very likely to burn at some point, and burying power lines mostly just reduces the chance that it will be triggered by PG&E. Prescribed burns, spreading out the combustion and moving it to safer times of year, would reduce fire risk far more for the money. Even though when PG&E pays for something the money comes from their customers, CA residents, this isn't a tradeoff PG&E is in a position to consider.

    The problem is that CA law puts too much focus on sparks: if you start a fire, you are fully liable for its damage. This approach makes sense in most places, where a "we will never let it burn" policy is practical. In ecosystems adapted for periodic burning, however, where flammable materials build up over time, it means everyone is trying not to be the legally recognized cause of the inevitable fire. And it makes prescribed burns look expensive because when one goes out of control, which there is always a risk, that puts the fire control organization on the hook for the full costs.

    Let's work on a system of laws and policies which lead to minimizing overall fire damage.

    Comment via: facebook, lesswrong

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    What I've been doing instead of writing

    I’ve been too busy with work to write much recently, but in lieu of that, here’s a batch of links to other stuff I’ve been doing elsewhere. The thing I’m most excited about: Wave raises $200m from Sequoia, Stripe, Founders Fund and Ribbit at a $1.7b valuati…

    via benkuhn.net September 11, 2021

    Meet a Historian: Michael Taylor on Why We Need Classics

    Note from the Editor: This week, Michael Taylor joins us to present A Defense of Classics. The last decade or so has seen Classics (the study of Mediterranean antiquity or more narrowly the study of Greece and Rome) in a hard sort of quandary. On the one …

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry September 10, 2021

    What’s Frustrating About Bus Redesigns

    The transit vlogger Alexandra Rose said something deeply disturbing and yet true on Twitter: More and more I think that bus network redesigns are too often just managed decline. I was really into zero cost change redesigns a few years ago, less so recentl…

    via Pedestrian Observations September 5, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact