• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Design Testing

    November 19th, 2011
    experiment, work, tech  [html]
    One of the things I really like about working on websites is that we can run real experiments. If we have a change we're considering making, we can have half our users see the new version while the other half see the old version, and we can see which one performs better. [1] These are randomized, controlled, double blind trials, with no publication bias issues, and a successful result means a better version of our site that we can start using immediately. After years in school where running a proper experiment meant weeks of careful experiment design, laborious data collection, compromises in experimental procedure for the sake of practicality, insufficient sample sizes, poor generalization, and unclear usefulness, this is really satisfying.

    One humbling aspect is that I've realized I'm not very good at predicting whether a change will help. None of us are. When we test new designs, sometimes they work well and other times they don't. [2] For an example of this, consider two redesigns from the early days of our daily deals website. The first is an email design, the second is a site design:

    Old:
    New:
    Old:
    New:
    One of these was a 14% improvement, the other a 27% degradation. Can you tell which was which?


    [1] Not all websites have an obvious metric for "performs better". For example, how does wikipedia know if a site change improves things for their users? (More edits? Better edits? More time reading? Less time?) We're generally trying to sell things, however, so we can mostly just look at the fraction of users who advance to the next step in the sales process.

    [2] This really shows the value of testing: if we just made every change we thought was good, we wouldn't improve anywhere near as much as just adopting the changes that help.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Learning Worst Industry Practices

    If I have a bad idea and you have a bad idea and we exchange them, we now have two bad ideas. But more than that. If I have a bad idea and you have a good idea and we exchange them, we should both land on your good idea – but that requires both […]

    via Pedestrian Observations September 20, 2020

    Collections: Iron, How Did They Make It? Part I, Mining

    This week we are starting a four-part look at pre-modern iron and steel production. As with our series on farming, we are going to follow the train of iron production from the mine to a finished object, be that a tool, a piece of armor, a simple nail, a w…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry September 18, 2020

    Learning Game

    I came up with this game. In the game one person thinks of something and then gives the other person a clue. And the other person writes a guess down on a blackboard or a piece of paper. Or really anything you have that's laying around that's av…

    via Lily Wise's Blog Posts September 17, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact