• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Covid Christmas

    December 4th, 2021
    covid-19
    Every year, my extended family gets together for Christmas. Several days of lots of people in the same place, eating, playing games, making music, and generally spending time together. We skipped last year, because of covid, and are thinking about what makes sense to do this year.

    If rates had stayed at about the same level they had been at since September, I think we would have been happy to get together more or less as normal. With everyone 5+ fully vaccinated, and most adults boosted, the risk seemed relatively low. But rates have gone up substantially here, especially in the last few days:

    We know this isn't just a post-Thanksgiving data issue, because we also see it in the sewage:

    This is changing quickly, and in the 2-3 weeks between now and when we'd be getting together there's a lot of time for rates to go up further or not.

    With this much uncertainty, I think it makes the most sense to plan by preparing options. This is a bit similar to the thinking a month ago on making dance events safer, but it's a smaller group of people with much higher trust.

    I think air purifiers make a lot of sense here, and box-fan cubes give you a lot of filtration cheaply and simply:

    (I'm considering putting a second cube on top to get five more filters per fan, which would also make it quieter.)

    Each 12-pack is $80 shipped, so the cube is $27 plus a box fan ($20, or you may have one) and some tape. Per microcovid, one in each room cuts risk by ~3/4. Opening windows is also a good idea if you have a heating system that can keep up (my dad's house does; ours does not).

    Since this is the same group of people getting together over a few days, spending a lot of time together each visit, I think rapid tests also make sense. They're down to $7/each, and while they do have some false negatives, they probably cut risk by ~3/4 if you do them at the beginning of each visit.

    If people wore decent (surgical+) masks the whole time, microcovid has this as cutting risk by ~7/8. If people took them off to snack, and are snacking ~10% of the time, then it's ~4/5 instead. [1] I think large group dinners with people packed very close together, are not a great idea. (Our family usually sits close enough at these meals that chairs are too wide we need to set some boards across chairs to make benches.) If we decided not to wear masks most of the time, it would likely still make sense to put them on for singing (since singing is ~5x riskier than talking).

    Rapid tests and filters are things we might not be able to get easily closer to the time, so I've bought a bunch now to keep options open. If we decide not to use them for this we'll use them for other things this winter.


    [1] If everyone snacks the same 10% of the time then it's 10% * 1 + 90% * 1/4 * 1/2 or 21%. If people each snack randomly then it's (10% * 1 + 90% * 1/4) * (10% * 1 + 90% * 1/2) or 18%. Not much difference.

    Comment via: facebook, lesswrong

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Moral aesthetics

    “Doing good” differs by subculture The post Moral aesthetics appeared first on Otherwise.

    via Otherwise September 29, 2022

    Futurist prediction methods and accuracy

    I've been reading a lot of predictions from people who are looking to understand what problems humanity will face 10-50 years out (and sometimes longer) in order to work in areas that will be instrumental for the future and wondering how accurate thes…

    via Posts on September 12, 2022

    On the Beach

    I really like going in the water and this beach is a great place for building sand castles and boogie boarding. I also like trying to float on top of big waves. I'm not very good at it. I only float on the flat waves.

    via Anna Wise's Blog Posts July 12, 2022

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact