• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Three Times the Cost of Food

    November 24th, 2012
    poverty  [html]
    I recently was talking to someone who claimed that the US Federal poverty line understates poverty:
    When the poverty line was developed in the 60s, the average family spent about 1/3 of their income on food. The government had reasonably good numbers for the minimum cost of food but not for other costs of living and so defined the poverty line as three times this minimum food cost. Over time food has gotten cheaper and so is now a much smaller share of people's expenses, but because the poverty line figure is still set at three times the cost of food it's much too low.
    This seemed unlikely, so I made a note to look it up. The US census has a history of the poverty line on its website, and it turns out that the description above is mostly correct. They really did start with the USDA economy food plan and multiply by three. But in the years since it's been adjusted for inflation, not recalculated from the cost of food each year. But it turns out they might as well have: it's still pretty close to three times the cost of food:
    Example annual numbers for a male-female couple with two kids:

    (This is still not a good measurement of poverty. A better one would use region-specific estimates of a minimum "basket of goods" needed to live on.)

    Previous writing on food costs: Food Costs on a Scale, the Problems with the Thrifty Food Plan.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    It's ok to feed stray cats

    Before we had kids, Jeff and I fostered a couple of cats. One had feline AIDS and was very skinny. Despite our frugal grocery budget of the time, I put olive oil on her food, determined to get her healthier. I knew that stray cats were not a top global pr…

    via Giving Gladly May 15, 2021

    Collections: Teaching Paradox, Europa Universalis IV, Part III: Europa Provincalis

    This is the third part of our series (I, II) examining the historical assumptions of Paradox Interactive’s grand strategy computer game set in the early modern period, Europa Universalis IV (which is in turn the start of a yet larger series looking at sev…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry May 14, 2021

    Randal O’Toole Gets High-Speed Rail Wrong

    Now that there’s decent chance of US investment in rail, Randal O’Toole is resurrecting his takes from the early Obama era, warning that high-speed rail is a multi-trillion dollar money sink. It’s not a good analysis, and in particular it gets the reality…

    via Pedestrian Observations May 12, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact