• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Repeated HTML Text Is Cheap

    February 19th, 2014
    tech  [html]
    The Guardian recently moved from guardian.co.uk to www.theguardian.com and wrote up their experiences. Among them:

    At this point, however, all the URLs on the site still pointed to www.guardian.co.uk. We attempted to fix this by implementing relative URLs across our site, but a lengthy investigation proved that this would be more difficult than it should have been. Instead, we wrote a filter which detected the HTTP Host header. If the host was www.theguardian.com, we would rewrite all the URLs on the site to be www.theguardian.com. If the Host was www.guardian.co.uk we would rewrite all the URLs on the site to be www.guardian.co.uk. This was a simple configuration change that swapped one domain for another, per request.

    Wait, they're using absolute urls instead of relative? Isn't that inefficient, repeating http://www.theguardian.com for every single link? That's 295 times:

        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | sed 's~http:~^http:~g' \
           | tr '^' '\n' | grep -c http://www.theguardian.com/
        295
    

    But how much bigger is this making their site, after all?

        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | wc -c
        222491
        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us \
           | sed s'~http://www.theguardian.com~~' | wc -c
        214795
        $ python -c 'print 222491-214795'
        7696
        $ python -c 'print "%.2f%%" % (7696.0 / 214795 * 100)'
        3.58%
    
    So they're using an extra 7.7kB and making their site 3.6% bigger, right? Except almost everyone will be downloading the site with gzip enabled:
        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | wc -c
        222491
        $ curl -s -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip' \
           http://www.theguardian.com/us | wc -c
        33576
    
    In other words, if you request the page simply it's 222k but if your browser sends Accept-Encoding: gzip with the request, and any browser you're likely to use does this, then it's only 34k. This is equivalent to downloading the page and then gzipping it ourselves:
        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | gzip | wc -c
        33576
    

    Now gzip compression does well with simple repeated strings, so how well does it handle these absolute urls? Let's repeat the test from above, this time encoding with gzip before counting bytes:

        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | gzip | wc -c
        33576
        $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us \
           | sed s'~http://www.theguardian.com~~' | gzip | wc -c
        33805
        $ python -c 'print 33576-33347'
        229
        $ python -c 'print "%.2f%%" % (229.0 / 33347 * 100)'
        0.69%
    
    So yes, they could save some bytes by switching to relative urls, but the savings are under 1%.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Economics: not as bad as I thought

    Also, it's not all about money. The post Economics: not as bad as I thought appeared first on Otherwise.

    via Otherwise May 13, 2022

    Buckingham Palace

    I love England. Especially because of the big castle called Buckingham Palace. I got to see the outside there, but my mom showed me some pictures of the inside. I love it there. But the outside doesn't look very fancy to me. But I never knew why those …

    via Anna Wise's Blog Posts April 25, 2022

    What is causality to an evidential decision theorist?

    (Subsumed by: Timeless Decision Theory, EDT=CDT) People sometimes object to evidential decision theory by saying: “It seems like the distinction between correlation and causation is really important to making good decisions in practice. So how can a theor…

    via The sideways view April 17, 2022

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact