• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Noticing confusion: running sound

    September 7th, 2012
    sound  [html]
    Recently I was running sound for a dance and encountered something a little strange while setting levels. My normal process is to set the initial gain using the level-meter and then set the faders by ear. If the level-meter accurately reflected perceived loudness [1] and I was hearing the instruments only through the speakers instead of also partially acoustically, you would expect the faders to end up in a straight line. Instead, because of those two issues, I usually end up with the faders not all the same, but still very close to the same unless the instrument is very loud acoustically, like a trumpet.

    This night I found that the level for the fiddle needed to be much higher than any of the other instruments, by about 20db, in order to sound well matched in the hall. It still sounded pretty much fine, but I remember it didn't sound as crisp as the mandolin. I thought "that's very strange, but I guess this fiddle's just peculiar" and moved on.

    At the break someone noticed that the clip-on mic the fiddler was using [2] was set up wrong. As a cardiod microphone it mostly picks up what you point it at and it was on backwards, pointing out into space. Turning it around it sounded better, because it was now picking up almost entirely "fiddle" instead of "a little bit of fiddle and a lot of random stage noise and other instruments". Correctly picking up just the fiddle also meant that its fader no longer needed to be up way higher than all the others.

    If I'd paid more attention to my sense of confusion I might have gotten the fiddle sounding better earlier. While I think I was right at first to put it aside as less important than some other things I still needed to set up, I should have come back to it later.

    On the other hand, calibrating your sense of confusion is hard. If you're too attentive to it you can spend too much time tracking down weird coincidences; you don't want it to become like a warning detector that's always going off making you learn to ignore it. While I don't know whether mine currently has the right threshold, I'm going to try paying more attention to it, especially when running sound.


    [1] The meter on the board shows the energy of the signal, but we perceive the same amount of sound energy at, say, 100hz to be quieter than at 500hz. There are conversion tables, and meters really ought do this conversion and show the appropriately weighted level. While this would be expensive in a traditional analog board, the new digital ones could do this easily.

    [2] I think it was an Audio Technica PRO 35, a common mic for dance fiddlers.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact