• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • N-Jie

    December 15th, 2013
    chinese, family, ling  [html]
    Growing up my great-aunt was sometimes "Izzy," sometimes "Irjya". This seemed normal, and I thought "Izzy" was short for "Irjya," like "Chuck" for "Charles" and other non-obvious diminutives. Her older sister was both "Addy" and "Dajya," and my great grandmother was just "Majya". I didn't really wonder why no one else had names like this, or why they all sounded similar.

    Over time I learned another set of names for them: Isabel, Adelaide, Mary. It could have seemed strange to me that they would have multiple conflicting full names, but it never really registered. Even later, though, studying Chinese I encountered "dajie" (大姐) and "erjie" (二姐) as "oldest sister" and "second oldest sister". My grandmother, the youngest of three sisters growing up in China, had used these names for her sisters and, as hers was the last generation in my family to have any Chinese, the names fossilized and lost their positional interpretations. [1]

    The extreme for this kind of preservation might be Kromanti, a ritual language of the Jamaican Maroons. At certain times, when an ancestor posesses a member of the community, they speak in a language appropriate for their era. The earliest ancestors, born in Africa, speak various lines composed of fixed phrases of a language which turns out to be a form of Akan, a West African language. (more)

    While a few names is not nearly as interesting as a whole chunk of a language, it's neat to see this process in action in the speech of my own family.


    [1] But why "Majie" (媽姐)? Asking my grandmother, she and her sisters made it up as a nickname, meaning something like mother-sister. Though apparently it also means something like "maidservant," and as a fluent Chinese speaker she would have known this, so I'm not sure what to make of it.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact