• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Gender-Free Role Term Usage

    January 26th, 2017
    contra, gender, roles  [html]
    Historically contra dance has used gendered terms for the roles, primarily "Gents / Ladies", but also some "Men / Women" and "Boys / Girls". In the late 1980s the Jamaica Plain dance, founded as a queer contra dance, switched to "Bands / Bare(arm)s". The idea is that dancers in the historically "Gent" role would tie armbands on, and the calls could be to the people with armbands or with bare arms. [1] When other queer contras formed they used "Bands / Bares" as well, but mainstream contras continued using gendered terms.

    Over the past five years or so there's been discussion about whether non-queer dances should switch to gender-free terminology as well. A big limitation has been objections to the "Bands / Bares" terms. Lots of people, especially the kind of people who care about role names, want to dance positionally. Armbands get in the way of positional dancing, and if you're not using armbands then the terms make less sense. Plus the terms are pretty similar sounding.

    I surveyed the Shared Weight callers list to ask what terms were being used for regular dances. What I found was that while an enormous number of alternate terms have been proposed, there are only three that seem to be catching on: "Larks / Ravens", "Jets / Rubies", and "Leads / Follows". We currently have:

    [EDIT: new chart is here.]

    ~310 Gents / Ladies Various
    6 Larks / Ravens Circle Left, South Bay, Berkeley, Hayward, Village Contra, LCFD Dance Camp (west coast)
    3 Bands / Bares JP, Western Mass Gender Free, LCFD Dance Camp (except west coast)
    2 Jets / Rubies Portland ME, Montpelier Contra Exchange
    2 Leads / Follows Hampshire College, Brooklyn Contra

    "Larks / Ravens" seems to have taken over the Bay Area: maybe half the dances there have switched? Aside from that there's not much of a pattern, except that most (3/5) of the queer dances are still using "Bands / Bares" and maybe we could group Portland and Montpelier as "Northern New England".

    Should we say that "Larks / Ravens" has won, and we should try to all switch to those terms? Or should we leave it a while longer first and see what happens?

    (Once there is a clear consensus on terms I'm planning to start pushing dances to switch, starting with BIDA.)

    Update 2017-01-31: I posted on FB asking if people had thoughts on BIDA using these terms, prompting a substantial discussion.

    Update 2017-03-21: All the Bands/Bares dances have switched to Larks/Ravens.

    Update 2017-10-06: BIDA switched to "Larks / Ravens" in June, and YDW used "Larks / Ravens" this year as well.

    Update 2017-10-19: The Sebastopol dance has decided to switch to "Larks / Ravens", starting with their next dance (January). The Montpelier Contra Exchange, which was "Jets / Rubies", has ended. The Hampshire College dance, which was "Leads / Follows", may or may not be defunct. A more up-to-date chart is now here.


    [1] Lots of details and history in Chris Ricciotti's "Welcome to Gender Free Dancing: a Historicsal Perspective" (pdf).

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact