• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Fermat Numbers

    October 3rd, 2013
    math  [html]
    I noticed while working on something else that 255 is 15*17, and 65535 is 255*257. In other words, it sounds like:
        2^(2^n)-1 * 2^(2^n)+1 = 2^(2^(n+1)) - 1
    
    Testing some numbers, it looks like this works:
    n 2^(2^n)-1 2^(2^n)+1 2^(2*(n+1)) - 1
    0 1 3 3
    1 3 5 15
    2 15 17 255
    3 255 257 65535
    4 65535 65537 4294967295
    And in fact we can prove that it holds for all n:
        2^(2^n)-1 * 2^(2^n)+1
           = 2^(2^n)*2^(2^n) + 2^(2^n) - 2^(2^n) - 1
           = 2^(2^n)*2^(2^n) - 1
           = 2^(2^n + 2^n) - 1
           = 2^(2*2^n) - 1
           = 2^(2^(n+1)) - 1
    
    If 255 is 15*17 and 15 is 3*5, however, then as long as the numbers 3, 5, 17, 257, etc. are prime we can build up prime factorizations. So 255 would factor into 3*5*17 and 65535 would factor into 3*5*17*257. This suggests that if you have a number in the form 2^(2^n)-1 then its prime factorization is the product of 2^(2^i)+1 from i=0 to i=n-1:
    n 2^(2^n)-1 prime factorization
    1 3 3
    2 15 3, 5
    3 255 3, 5, 17
    4 65535 3, 5, 17, 257
    5 4294967295 3, 5, 17, 257, 65537
    Neat!

    But then I thought to try one more, and was very surprised:

    n 2^(2^n)-1 prime factorization
    6 18446744073709551615 3, 5, 17, 257, 641, 65537, 6700417
    Why did our nice pattern break? It looks like 2^(2^5)+1 (or 4294967297) is 641*6700417. So not all numbers in the form 2^(2^n)+1 are prime, only the first five. The sequence is the Fermat numbers, integer sequence A000215. Such are the dangers of extrapolation.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Willingness to look stupid

    People frequently1 think that I'm very stupid. I don't find this surprising, since I don't mind if other people think I'm stupid, which means that I don't adjust my behavior to avoid seeming stupid, which results in people thinking tha…

    via Posts on Dan Luu October 21, 2021

    Experiences in raising children in shared housing

    Sometimes I see posts about people’s hope to raise children in a group housing situation, and it often seems overly optimistic to me. In particular they seem to expect that there will be more shared childcare than I think should be expected. Today I talke…

    via The whole sky October 18, 2021

    EDT with updating double counts

    I recently got confused thinking about the following case: Calculator bet: I am offered the opportunity to bet on a mathematical statement X to which I initially assign 50% probability (perhaps X = 139926 is a quadratic residue modulo 314159). I have acce…

    via The sideways view October 12, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact