• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Crooked Tunes for Ordinary Dances

    October 26th, 2010
    calling, contra  [html]
    Contra dance has a very standard musical form: 64 beats in eight 8-beat phrases. Dances require this, though some only need 16-beat phrases and some work better if there's some 4-beat chunkiness. There are a small number of contra dances that don't fit this pattern [1] but I can only think of one [2] that's actually crooked [3]. Dancers certainly notice, which is not ideal as I don't want to make dancers think, but as long as the caller's on top of things it works. Playing around with "the walloping window blind" as a possible dance tune has me thinking how maybe if you could add some beats early in a phrase but still end it clearly, you might be able to keep people from having to think about it at all. The problem with the song in question is that (if A is the verse and B is the chorus) in the middle of the A2 and at the end of the B1 it adds two beats. [4] You can square it up simply by squishing the four rising notes into two beats instead of four, but I'm thinking you might only need to do that with the B part (where it's at the end) if you used the appropriate dance. Anything with a balance and swing in the A2, such as mary cay's, alligator reel, or heartbeat contra, ought to work.

    Now I need to try this out with some dancers. I think it would work, but you can't tell until you try it. I also think there's some chance you could actually leave in both places where it's crooked, but I'm not sure.


    [1] For example, the chestnut "money musk" which is only 48 beats or the modern dance "alternating corners" which takes 128.

    [2] Cherokee Shuffle, when danced with the extra balance at the end gets another four beats of melody.

    [3] A crooked tune is one that doesn't divide evenly into eight beat phrases.

    [4] If you're looking at the lyrics the beats are added where the words are stretched out: "play-ai-ey-a", "crew-ai-ew-a".

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact