• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Contra Dance in Concord NH

    June 17th, 2006
    dancing  [html]
    Just back from the contra dance in Concord NH. Neat place. It was in a community center in a place that really felt a lot like Snicker's Gap by Bluemont. Center of stores in a rural area, wooden buildings, low porches out front. The dance itself was both a really good dance and a really bad dance. But I had a good time. It was small, with several new people and the music was amazing; Nat Hewitt on fiddle with Finn Hewitt on keyboard. The caller, however, was not really so amazing and kept messing things up. Oh well.

    What really struck me most was the dance composition, though. There were two squares and I think four proper dances. There were at least four dances with no neighbor swing, two of which had no swings at all. English-feeling figures seemed to be considered the more basic sort; in the second dance -- which was done like a teaching dance -- there were figure-eights, hand casts, and waist casts. Soon after was a dance with contra corners. And people were more comfortable with the contra corners than more modernish things like `box the gnat'. People also did not do swing-style twirls (such as the one going into a swing or after a circle left) or expect them. I guess that the classification `modern urban contra' for dances like the Springstep/VFW isn't that far off.

    Addendum 7/21: They also took ladies chain to be by default all the way over and all the way back, with the definition I'm used to being called a 'half ladies chain'. They also once called half a hey for four which while I reasonable call is never once I'd heard before. Half a hey is faster and contra has not had heys for three for so long that there's no confusion. I do wonder what would happen if the caller called "first man, both women, hey for three". Probably confusion, too much to even be solved with a walk through. And unhappiness on the part of the left out man.

    Comment via: facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact