• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Contra Dance Band Size

    January 26th, 2014
    contra, music  [html]
    What's a good size for a contra dance band? Back before amplification you wanted a large band to give a full sound to the dancers, but now we can make any band as loud as we want. As you add more musicians you add the potential for more variety and complexity, but you also make coordination more difficult and become a more expensive proposition to hire.

    At each band size the question is: would this band be better with more people? How much better? When you go from one to two people the answer is basically always "better by a lot". There are some very good fiddlers that I could have a great time dancing to, but I can't think of a case where pairing them with the right guitar or piano player wouldn't make for a lot more fun dancing. Going from two to three people is also usually a large improvement, but there are some excellent two person bands. Some of them use looping or pre-recorded tracks to fill out their sound while others are entirely live. Still, there's usually a lot a third person can add.

    From my perspective the fourth or fifth musician is where you start to hit diminishing returns. There's a cohesion that is much easier at smaller sizes and four or five is where I start to feel it breaking down. Getting even larger, to six or seven, can make sense if you're going for a Ceilidh or Big-Band sound, but with traditional contra instrumentation you often just get people stepping on each other.

    With my preferences out of the way, what does booking look like? How large are the bands that get hired to play? I looked over the websites for several dances, and tracked the size of the bands. These are all relatively frequent dances; I looked at the various smaller monthly Boston-area dances but none of them listed the band compositions. I skipped open bands and a small number of bands where I couldn't find the number of musicians anywhere. When a band included the caller (Elixir, Wild Asparagus) I didn't count the caller toward the size of the band. So:

    • Scout House Thursday
          2 ***
          3 *********************************
          4 ***********************
          5 *****
          
    • BIDA
          2 *********
          3 ************************
          4 ****
          5 *
          
    • MIT
          2 ***********
          3 *******************************
          4 ******
          5 *
          6 *
          
    • Glen Echo Sunday
          2 ****
          3 ****************
          4 *************
          5 ***
          6
          7 *
          
    • Glen Echo Friday
          2 ***
          3 ***************************
          4 ***************
          5 **
          
    • Glenside
          2 *****
          3 ***************
          4 *********************
          5 ****
          6
          7 *
          

    Some series or dance communities seem to have a preference for trios while others like quartets, and some rarely book duos while others seem comfortable with them. Overall, however, smaller bands are much more common, with no six-piece bands and only a few 7-piece ones.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Building Depth and Window Space

    How much window space does an apartment need, relative to its area, and how does this affect building style? A fascinating post from about a year ago on Urban Kchoze makes the argument that modern North American buildings are too deep – Simon calls them o…

    via Pedestrian Observations November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact