• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Contra Dance Band Size

    January 26th, 2014
    contra, music  [html]
    What's a good size for a contra dance band? Back before amplification you wanted a large band to give a full sound to the dancers, but now we can make any band as loud as we want. As you add more musicians you add the potential for more variety and complexity, but you also make coordination more difficult and become a more expensive proposition to hire.

    At each band size the question is: would this band be better with more people? How much better? When you go from one to two people the answer is basically always "better by a lot". There are some very good fiddlers that I could have a great time dancing to, but I can't think of a case where pairing them with the right guitar or piano player wouldn't make for a lot more fun dancing. Going from two to three people is also usually a large improvement, but there are some excellent two person bands. Some of them use looping or pre-recorded tracks to fill out their sound while others are entirely live. Still, there's usually a lot a third person can add.

    From my perspective the fourth or fifth musician is where you start to hit diminishing returns. There's a cohesion that is much easier at smaller sizes and four or five is where I start to feel it breaking down. Getting even larger, to six or seven, can make sense if you're going for a Ceilidh or Big-Band sound, but with traditional contra instrumentation you often just get people stepping on each other.

    With my preferences out of the way, what does booking look like? How large are the bands that get hired to play? I looked over the websites for several dances, and tracked the size of the bands. These are all relatively frequent dances; I looked at the various smaller monthly Boston-area dances but none of them listed the band compositions. I skipped open bands and a small number of bands where I couldn't find the number of musicians anywhere. When a band included the caller (Elixir, Wild Asparagus) I didn't count the caller toward the size of the band. So:

    • Scout House Thursday
          2 ***
          3 *********************************
          4 ***********************
          5 *****
          
    • BIDA
          2 *********
          3 ************************
          4 ****
          5 *
          
    • MIT
          2 ***********
          3 *******************************
          4 ******
          5 *
          6 *
          
    • Glen Echo Sunday
          2 ****
          3 ****************
          4 *************
          5 ***
          6
          7 *
          
    • Glen Echo Friday
          2 ***
          3 ***************************
          4 ***************
          5 **
          
    • Glenside
          2 *****
          3 ***************
          4 *********************
          5 ****
          6
          7 *
          

    Some series or dance communities seem to have a preference for trios while others like quartets, and some rarely book duos while others seem comfortable with them. Overall, however, smaller bands are much more common, with no six-piece bands and only a few 7-piece ones.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    It's ok to feed stray cats

    Before we had kids, Jeff and I fostered a couple of cats. One had feline AIDS and was very skinny. Despite our frugal grocery budget of the time, I put olive oil on her food, determined to get her healthier. I knew that stray cats were not a top global pr…

    via Giving Gladly May 15, 2021

    Collections: Teaching Paradox, Europa Universalis IV, Part III: Europa Provincalis

    This is the third part of our series (I, II) examining the historical assumptions of Paradox Interactive’s grand strategy computer game set in the early modern period, Europa Universalis IV (which is in turn the start of a yet larger series looking at sev…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry May 14, 2021

    Randal O’Toole Gets High-Speed Rail Wrong

    Now that there’s decent chance of US investment in rail, Randal O’Toole is resurrecting his takes from the early Obama era, warning that high-speed rail is a multi-trillion dollar money sink. It’s not a good analysis, and in particular it gets the reality…

    via Pedestrian Observations May 12, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact