• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Charles Gray, World Equity Man

    December 11th, 2011
    ea
    Several years ago I read a book on voluntary poverty. It was a collection of writing by people who were choosing to be poor. The one that most struck me was Charles Gray. He thought the biggest problem with the world was inequality, and to fix that people needed to consume no more than their equal share. He calculated his share of world GDP [1] and called this the "world equity budget" [2]. Earning more than this would be unfair to others, because he would be taking their share. [3]

    In many ways I admire him: he was trying to make the world better, and was willing to sacrifice enormously toward that end. Mostly, however, he just makes me sad: he could have done so much more good, helped so many more people, if he had taken an 'earn more, give more' approach. His story reminds me that it's neither the effort nor the thought that counts, and that it's not what you sacrifice that determines your effect on the world.

    [1] World GDP/Capita is currently $9.2K. That's low, but it isn't actually all that low. Julia and I are currently living on $8.7K/person, plus health insurance, which I get from work. In 1979, however, per capita GDP was $2.2K in 2010 dollars. Which would be (was) way harder.

    [2] He really liked to call things the "World Equity X". I recall at least the "World Equity Budget", the "World Equity Wage", and the "World Equity Gap".

    [3] I'm working from memory in describing what he believed. I can find some of his writing online, but I can't find something where he lays out why he's decided he should live on the world equity budget.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Interview with Kat Woods: decision-making about having kids

    Realizing what you don't want The post Interview with Kat Woods: decision-making about having kids appeared first on Otherwise.

    via Otherwise July 5, 2022

    Decision theory and dynamic inconsistency

    Here is my current take on decision theory: When making a decision after observing X, we should condition (or causally intervene) on statements like “My decision algorithm outputs Y after observing X.” Updating seems like a description of something you do…

    via The sideways view July 3, 2022

    10x (engineer, context) pairs

    Your actual output depends on a lot more than just how quickly you finish a given programming task. Everything besides the literal coding depends deeply on the way you interact with the organization around you.

    via benkuhn.net June 9, 2022

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact