### Weissman Scores: Useful?

September 23rd, 2015
tech
A TV show got an information theory professor to make up a metric for evaluating compression algorithms so they could make claims of a breakthrough. This is great—who doesn't like striving for accuracy in media—until people start saying we should be using the metric to evaluate real data compression algorithms. Now we move from the fluffy world of "good enough to be passable on TV" to the far stricter "actually captures what we care about" and, unfortunately, this metric fails the harder test.

The metric is:

```      efficiency_new
-------------------
efficiency_baseline
```
Where `efficiency` is:
```       compression_ratio
---------------------
log(compression_time)
```
The `compression_time` is just how long it takes to run the algorithm while the `compression_ratio` is:
```    uncompressed_size
-----------------
compressed_size
```
There are two ideas here: (a) the ratio between the efficiency of a new algorithm and a standard baseline algorithm like `gzip` is a good way to control for how compressable a corpus is and (b) `efficiency` captures what matters about a compression algorithm. While (a) seems plausible, (b) is way off. The problem with this metric is that it pays much more attention to the time than the ratio, when we usually care much more about the ratio. So let's look again at how `efficiency` is defined:
```       compression_ratio
---------------------
log(compression_time)
```
Say we currently can manage 10% compression (ratio = 100/90 = 1.11) and it takes us 16ms. That's
```    compression_ratio / log(compression_time)
= 1.11 / log(16)
= 0.2775
```
Now we have two proposals. One brings us to from 10% compression to 55% compression (ratio = 100/45 = 2.22) while the other one drops compression time to 4ms:
```   compression_ratio / log(compression_time)
= 2.22 / log(16)
= 0.555
```
vs
```    compression_ratio / log(compression_time)
= 1.11 / log(4)
= 0.555
```
These have the same `efficiency`, but improving compression by 5x will nearly always be better than improving speed by 4x. Take this to the extreme: a compressor that exits immediately leaving its input unchanged has the best possible `efficiency` score, despite being useless.

This score is also missing some other things we care a lot about. Many things are compressed once but decompressed millions of times. Consider an image on a popular website. The site owner probably compressed the image once on uploading, while every single site visitor will need to decompress the image before they can view it. So in this sort of case we're often willing to put much more work into compression if it can save a little work each time it's decompressed.

Another thing that matters a lot for practical adoption of compression algorithms is resource efficiency, primarily memory. When your browser downloads a web page it tells the server ```Accept-Encoding: gzip``` and the server will typically gzip-compress its response on the fly. The server tags it `Content-Encoding: gzip`, and the browser automatically unzips it before using the response. Both the browser and server are processing lots of simultaneous transfers, and each one of those needs to handle compression, so there's a big difference between each needing about ~50K of memory with gzip and needing up to several MB with brotli.

This also illustrates another important issue with compression: different use cases need different metrics. For on-the-fly compression you don't want to take so much time compressing that this beats the time savings from needing to transfer fewer bytes, while for advance compression small increases in the compression ratio matter a huge amount.

I'm definitely in favor of TV shows seeking out expert advice, but this metric should probably stay on TV.

### Recent posts on blogs I like:

#### Contra Scott Alexander On Apologies

I really need a short word for "complicatedly in favor of"

via Thing of Things September 12, 2024

#### Don't Help Kids With Contra Dancing If They Don't Need Help

If you're a kid like me, most kids have probably never heard of contra dancing before. You're probably wondering: contra dance -- what's that? Contra dancing is in some ways similar to square dancing. It's a group dance with a caller and…

via Lily Wise's Blog Posts September 9, 2024

#### Two 19th-century missionary memoirs in China

Life for an American family in 1860s China The post Two 19th-century missionary memoirs in China appeared first on Otherwise.

via Otherwise August 24, 2024