::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact

We should be testing street removal

April 2nd, 2012
transit  [html]
I had heard that removing a street can speed up traffic, but I hadn't really internalized it until I read:
When a network is not congested, adding a new street will indeed make things better. But in the case of congested networks, adding a new street probably makes things worse at least half the time, mathematicians say.
Half the time? Then there's a very cheap way to reduce congestion in our cities: test which roads speed up traffic when closed (or heavily tolled) for rush hour. If we can use simulations to get a good idea which ones to test, all the better.

That quote is from 1990, based on a 1983 paper. Why aren't we testing closures yet?

Comment via: google plus, facebook

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Maybe it’s not me– it’s grad school

Just a low effort post. I would love a mutually supportive comment discussion about it (because I’m not on facebook). Twitter replies would be nice, too.  I appreciated this post from Ben Kuhn, Grad school is worse for public health than STDs. In it he ca…

via Holly Elmore December 11, 2019

Grad school is worse for public health than STDs

(The way you can *really* tell something is horribly wrong is that grad students find PhD Comics darkly funny, not just dark.)

via benkuhn.net December 8, 2019

I’m Giving a Talk About Construction Costs Tomorrow

By popular demand, I’m giving the talk I gave 2 weeks ago at NYU, again. The database will be revised slightly to include more examples (like Ukraine, which I added between when I gave the talk and when I blogged about it), and I may switch around a few t…

via Pedestrian Observations December 2, 2019

more     (via openring)

More Posts:


  ::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact