• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Value of a Computational Process?

    July 9th, 2012
    morality  [html]
    Consider a future person living a happy and fulfilling life. They're unfortunate enough to suffer a severe accident, but there's time to preserve and then scan their brain fully, after which they can be brought back up in an emulator on a computer. [1] It doesn't matter that they're now running on digital hardware instead of in a biological brain; they're still a person and they still count.

    Now imagine this person or "em" asks to be let alone, cuts off all communication from the rest of the world, and rejoices privately in finally being able to fully explore their introverted nature. This isn't what I imagine myself doing, but is a choice I can respect.

    Someone comes along and suggests turning off this person's emulation on the grounds that no one will know the difference, and we can use the hardware for something else. This seems wrong. Which means this computational process is valuable entirely for its own sake, independent of its effect on the world.

    Unlike biological brains, computational processes are very flexible. We could run many copies, or run them much faster or slower than usual. We could run a specific segment of their independent experience repeatedly, perhaps the happiest few moments. It also seems unlikely that a full emulation of a human is the only thing that's valuable. Perhaps there are simpler patterns we could emulate that would be much better in terms of value per dollar?

    I'm trying to reduce my concept of value and getting lots of strange questions.


    [1] I think this will be possible, but not for a while.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook, lesswrong

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Children’s podcast recommendations

    I’ve emailed my list to enough friends that I should really just post it. Podcasts have been a big part of Lily’s life since around age 4. Before that, she spent a lot of her time demanding of any available adult, “READ. READ TO ME” (once she literally as…

    via The whole sky October 11, 2020

    Collections: Iron, How Did They Make It, Part IVa: Steel Yourself

    This week, we continue our four(and a half)-part (I, II, III, IVa, IVb) look at pre-modern iron and steel production. Last week, we looked at how a blacksmith reshapes our iron from a spongy mass called a bloom first into a more workable shape and then fi…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry October 9, 2020

    High-Speed Rail and Cities

    When preparing various maps proposing high-speed rail in Germany, I was told that it looks nice but it overfocuses on the largest cities and not about connecting the entirety of the country. I’ve seen such criticism elsewhere, asserting that high-speed ra…

    via Pedestrian Observations October 8, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact