• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Simultaneous Randomized Chess

    December 26th, 2020
    games, ideas  [html]
    David and I played around with the idea of a simultaneous chess variant until we found one that seems balanced. Rules:

    1. Both players secretly select a move.
      1. If both can execute without conflict, both do.
      2. If both can execute only in a specific order, they are executed in that order.
      3. Otherwise, one move is discarded at random and the other executes.
    2. You may not choose a move that would end with your king in check, given the current board position.
    3. You win by capturing or checkmating the opponent's king.
    4. In selecting a move you choose a maximum number of spaces, but a capture before reaching the maximum counts as a successful move.
    5. You may select a move if it could be legal after some opponent move. If it ends up not being legal, it doesn't happen.
    6. To capture en passant you must attempt the capture simultaneously.
    7. If you are using a clock, it only counts the time between the move selections.

    Consider this position:

    Say White chooses f3-f7 and Black anticipates that and chooses e8-f7. Black is allowed to make this move because (2) does not apply and (5) does. If we resolved Black's move first then only White's move could happen, but if we resolve White's first then both can happen, so we get the latter:

    First White takes the pawn at f7, then Black takes the queen at f7. Alternatively, Black could have selected f7-f6. In that case the only way for both to happen would have been for Black's moved to happen first, at which point (4) means White's queen captures at f6 instead of f7:

    This is a bad situation for White, because pawns very powerful. Because a diagonal move only succeeds if it is a capture, (1.3) means Black selecting g7-f6 forces a 50-50 for the White queen. Whereas, if the queen were threatened by any other piece it could just move away (1.2).

    In writing this up I found that there is already a Simultaneous Chess variant. That version has a system of "initiative" to handle conflict resolution, which seems like it would play quite differently.

    Comment via: facebook, lesswrong

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Austerity is Inefficient

    Working on an emergency timetable for regional rail has made it clear how an environment of austerity requires tradeoffs that reduce efficiency. I already talked about how the Swiss electronics before concrete slogan is not about not spending money but ab…

    via Pedestrian Observations February 27, 2021

    Fireside Friday, February 26, 2021

    Fireside this week, but next week we are diving into our long awaited series on pre-modern textile production, though we will be particularly focused on the most important clothing fibers in the Mediterranean world, wool and linen (rather than, say, silk …

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry February 26, 2021

    The Troubling Ethics of Writing (A Speech from Ancient Sumer)

    (Translated from a transcript of an ancient Sumerian speech by Uruk's most well-respected Scriptological Ethicist) Writing is a profoundly dangerous technology: Access to writing was initially, and still remains, uneven. What's worse, the rich are m…

    via BLOG - Cullen O'Keefe February 15, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact