• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Simultaneous Randomized Chess

    December 26th, 2020
    games, ideas  [html]
    David and I played around with the idea of a simultaneous chess variant until we found one that seems balanced. Rules:

    1. Both players secretly select a move.
      1. If both can execute without conflict, both do.
      2. If both can execute only in a specific order, they are executed in that order.
      3. Otherwise, one move is discarded at random and the other executes.
    2. You may not choose a move that would end with your king in check, given the current board position.
    3. You win by capturing or checkmating the opponent's king.
    4. In selecting a move you choose a maximum number of spaces, but a capture before reaching the maximum counts as a successful move.
    5. You may select a move if it could be legal after some opponent move. If it ends up not being legal, it doesn't happen.
    6. To capture en passant you must attempt the capture simultaneously.
    7. If you are using a clock, it only counts the time between the move selections.

    Consider this position:

    Say White chooses f3-f7 and Black anticipates that and chooses e8-f7. Black is allowed to make this move because (2) does not apply and (5) does. If we resolved Black's move first then only White's move could happen, but if we resolve White's first then both can happen, so we get the latter:

    First White takes the pawn at f7, then Black takes the queen at f7. Alternatively, Black could have selected f7-f6. In that case the only way for both to happen would have been for Black's moved to happen first, at which point (4) means White's queen captures at f6 instead of f7:

    This is a bad situation for White, because pawns very powerful. Because a diagonal move only succeeds if it is a capture, (1.3) means Black selecting g7-f6 forces a 50-50 for the White queen. Whereas, if the queen were threatened by any other piece it could just move away (1.2).

    In writing this up I found that there is already a Simultaneous Chess variant. That version has a system of "initiative" to handle conflict resolution, which seems like it would play quite differently.

    Comment via: facebook, lesswrong

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Best Practices Civil Service

    I propose that transportation agencies hire people whose job is to keep abreast of global developments in the field and report on best practices. Which agencies should do it? Ideally, all urban ones. Very small ones should piggyback on large ones, or part…

    via Pedestrian Observations June 14, 2021

    Collections: The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginnings and Legends

    Who were the Romans? How did they understand themselves as a people and ‘Roman’ as an identity? And what were the implications of that understanding – and perhaps more importantly the underlying reality – for Roman society and the success of the Roman Emp…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry June 11, 2021

    It's ok to feed stray cats

    Before we had kids, Jeff and I fostered a couple of cats. One had feline AIDS and was very skinny. Despite our frugal grocery budget of the time, I put olive oil on her food, determined to get her healthier. I knew that stray cats were not a top global pr…

    via Giving Gladly May 15, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact