• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Rebrand Betting as a Guarantee

    December 12th, 2013
    betting, ideas  [html]
    A: I hear the Red Sox are playing the Yankees again.
    B: You "hear"? I keep talking about it!
    A: Well, yeah. Sorry! Who's going to win?
    B: The Sox, obviously. Though to be fair the bookies are giving them even odds.
    A: Want to bet on it?
    B: Sure. $10 that they win?
    A: If the Sox win, how will you feel?
    B: Awesome.
    A: And if they lose?
    B: Depressed.
    A: So shouldn't you be betting me $10 that they'll lose?
    B: Because then if they lose I'll at least have $10 and if they win I won't care about the $10, reducing my variance? That's logically correct, but it's also disloyal.
    A: What if I sell you a guarantee that the Sox win? Like insurance?
    B: Like I pay you $10 now, and if they lose you give me my money back? I'm not an idiot.
    A: No, you pay me $10 now, and if they lose I'll give you double your money back.
    B: Actually, that seems fair...

    To bet implies you think something is going to happen, and that by your internal estimate of probabilities you expect to come out ahead. So when people talk about insurance as betting it seems strange: flood insurance is a bet that my house will flood? Why would I bet that my house is going to flood? That would be terrible! With gurarantees and insurance, however, people can take exactly the same financial positions but view them differently:

    do nothing bet that Sox win bet that Sox lose buy guarantee that Sox win
    Sox win $0, happy +$10, happy -$10, happy -$10, happy
    Sox lose $0, sad -$10, sad +$10, sad +$10, sad
    There's no difference here between "bet that Sox lose" and "buy guarantee that Sox win" but at least to my non-sports-betting ear only the first sounds disloyal.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Best Practices Civil Service

    I propose that transportation agencies hire people whose job is to keep abreast of global developments in the field and report on best practices. Which agencies should do it? Ideally, all urban ones. Very small ones should piggyback on large ones, or part…

    via Pedestrian Observations June 14, 2021

    Collections: The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginnings and Legends

    Who were the Romans? How did they understand themselves as a people and ‘Roman’ as an identity? And what were the implications of that understanding – and perhaps more importantly the underlying reality – for Roman society and the success of the Roman Emp…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry June 11, 2021

    It's ok to feed stray cats

    Before we had kids, Jeff and I fostered a couple of cats. One had feline AIDS and was very skinny. Despite our frugal grocery budget of the time, I put olive oil on her food, determined to get her healthier. I knew that stray cats were not a top global pr…

    via Giving Gladly May 15, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact