::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact

Legal questions around safety committees

November 14th, 2018
contra, safety  [html]
As communities try to do a better job preventing and limiting abuse, harassment, etc, one common approach has been to put together a committee to hear reports and investigate problems (example). For a community that exists in isolation, my understanding is that there aren't really open legal questions: they can take action up to and including banning as needed. Where this gets tricky, though, is with coordination between groups.

In the contra dance community, for example, there are hundreds of independently organized dances. I once compared this to a pizza-and-subs model, where if you walk into any independent pizza shop, at least in New England, you'll find the same menu, same food, same prices, same service, possibly even the same furniture. They aren't part of a chain that tells them what they have to do to be a pizza place, but they get most of the same benefits in a less organized way. This informal system has some really nice aspects, with high independence and low overhead, but it makes coordination hard.

For example, say someone harms others in one dance community, eventually gets banned, then moves to another city and starts dancing there. They show up already knowing how to dance well, which gives them a bunch of social capital right away, and they're probably able to start their cycle over again quickly. Or someone dances in two adjacent communities, and gets banned in one of them. You'd like the organizations to be able to share information, but figuring out how to do this without opening themselves up to slander/libel is tricky.

In a group I follow someone recently posted that they were thinking about hiring a lawyer to ask some questions around this, and were looking for a write-up of questions. Here's the list of questions I posted there in response:

  • My organization has heard first hand reports about someone's behavior. Can we share any of this with other organizations?

  • My organization has banned someone. Can we share that fact? Can we share why we decided to ban them without outing victims?

  • Is there a distinction between sharing with other organizations and sharing publicly?

  • In collecting reports about problem behavior is there anything we need to be aware of around people having a right not to be tracked?

  • Do these vary by state?

I have a rough sense of American slander/libel law from reading discussions online, but it would be really useful to get solid well-explained answers to these sorts of questions. I both want groups to be able to coordinate and to be fully on the right side of the law. If this person's effort to get legal advice doesn't pan out I might try to organize something similar.

Comment via: google plus, facebook

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Empire State High- and Low-Speed Rail

If Swiss planners were hired to design an intercity rail network for New York State, they might propose something that looks like this: The trip times depicted on the map are a few minutes longer than intended, especially next to a terminus station like N…

via Pedestrian Observations January 27, 2020

Hedonic asymmetries

Creating really good outcomes for humanity seems hard. We get bored. If we don’t get bored, we still don’t like the idea of joy without variety. And joyful experiences only seems good if they are real and meaningful (in some sense we can’t easily pin down…

via The sideways view January 26, 2020

Live the questions now

Here’s some advice that my Godmother, Lynne Caldwell, gave me a few years ago. I found it again the other day and it struck me that at least I understand its wisdom now. She really did get my problem. It feels like he’s speaking directly to me. It’s from …

via Holly Elmore January 23, 2020

more     (via openring)

More Posts:


  ::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact