### Expected Value and the Two Envelope Problem

September 4th, 2011
expected_value  [html]
Someone puts \$X in one envelope and \$2X in another. They hand you one at random. Before you open it and keep the contents, they offer to let you switch your envelope for the other one. You can't detect any differences between the two envelopes. Should you accept their offer to switch?

Common sense says no: the two are identical, you have even odds of getting \$X and \$2X. Expected value, however, says yes. Whatever envelope you have has some amount of money \$Y in it. The other envelope has, with even odds, \$2Y and \$0.5Y. The expected value of switching, then, is the average of \$2Y and \$0.5Y, or \$1.25Y, minus the \$Y in the envelope you have. That would be \$0.25Y as the expected value of switching, so you should switch. Unfortunately, now that you have switched, you would repeat all this logic, determine that the other envelope had more money, and switch again. Forever. Does expected value trap us in eternal loops of envelope cycling?

This is often considered to be a demonstration of how expected value can give unreasonable answers. But perhaps a solution to this is to frame things differently. We know one of the envelopes has \$X and the other has \$2X. In switching you are either going from \$X to \$2X or the reverse; either gaining \$X or losing \$X. So the expected value of switching is the average of \$X and -\$X, or zero.

The second framing gives a more reasonable answer, but is there any other reason to prefer it to the first?

### Recent posts on blogs I like:

#### Streaming the Biden Infrastructure Plan

I streamed my thoughts about the Biden infrastructure plan, and unlike previous streams, I uploaded this to YouTube. I go into more details (and more tangents) on video, but, some key points: Out of the nearly \$600 billion in the current proposal that is …

via Pedestrian Observations April 11, 2021

#### Collections: Clothing, How Did They Make it? Part IVb: Cloth Money

This is the second half of the fourth part of our four part (I, II, III, IVa) look at the production of textiles, particularly wool and linen, in the pre-modern world. Last time, we looked at commercial textile workers and the finishing processes for text…

via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry April 9, 2021

#### Notes from “Don’t Shoot the Dog”

I just finished Karen Pryor’s “Don’t Shoot the Dog: the New Art of Teaching and Training.” Partly because a friend points out that it’s not on Audible and therefore she can’t possibly read it, here are the notes I took and some thoughts. It’s a quick, eas…

via The whole sky April 2, 2021