• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Donate Money, Not Time or Stuff

    March 11th, 2011
    giving  [html]
    If you care about doing as much good as possible with your efforts, you should give money, not time or stuff. When you spend time volunteering for a charity you're almost always doing something at which you are not especially good at [1] instead of something you're better at and more experienced with:

    There is this very, very old puzzle/observation in economics about the lawyer who spends an hour volunteering at the soup kitchen, instead of working an extra hour and donating the money to hire someone to work for five hours at the soup kitchen.

    There's this thing called "Ricardo's Law of Comparative Advantage". There's this idea called "professional specialization". There's this notion of "economies of scale". There's this concept of "gains from trade". The whole reason why we have money is to realize the tremendous gains possible from each of us doing what we do best.

    This is what grownups do. This is what you do when you want something to actually get done. You use money to employ full-time specialists. -- Eliezer Yudkowsky

    Similarly, when you give stuff, it's probably not the right stuff or in the right place. There are lots of problems with trying to use donated stuff for aid work, including limited transportation, dumping, storage space, and inconsistency. Claire Durham of the Red Cross describes the problems very well.

    To maximize the good you do (as opposed to getting personal fulfillment through volunteering or getting rid of unwanted stuff), give whatever charity organization you're working with what they can do the most good with: money.

    [1] This is mostly if you're serving soup or helping build houses. If you're providing professional services that the charity would otherwise have to purchase (a lawyer volunteering to do legal work) then you're cutting out some of the overhead of hiring people.

    Comment via: facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Randal O’Toole Gets High-Speed Rail Wrong

    Now that there’s decent chance of US investment in rail, Randal O’Toole is resurrecting his takes from the early Obama era, warning that high-speed rail is a multi-trillion dollar money sink. It’s not a good analysis, and in particular it gets the reality…

    via Pedestrian Observations May 12, 2021

    Collections: Teaching Paradox, Europa Universalis IV, Part II: Red Queens

    This is the second part in a series (I) that examines the historical assumptions behind Paradox Interactive’s grand strategy computer game set in the early modern period, Europa Universalis IV (EU4). Last time, we took a look at how EU4 was a game fundame…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry May 7, 2021

    Books and websites on babies

    Several people I know are expecting a first baby soon, and I wrote up notes for one of them. Might as well share here too: Medical:Scott Alexander’s Biodeterminist’s Guide to Parenting is an interesting read, and some parts are actionable.  If you live in…

    via The whole sky April 14, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact