::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact

Do Not Track

April 27th, 2011
donottrack, privacy  [html]
The do not track header is moving forward, with an initial draft released in march. The idea is that browsers could be set to send an "I opt out of tracking" header, and any server receiving the header would be supposed to refrain from third party tracking, where:
A third party is a functional entity with which the user does not reasonably expect to share data. In general advertising networks, analytics services, and social plug-in providers are third parties. (p6)
This is mostly fueled with concern about behavioral advertising. The way this currently works is that advertising networks track users from site to site and will try to show ads that are personalized for that user. This is a small fraction of advertising now, but as computers get faster and our capacity for storing and sorting through data grows, this could become very effective and profitable.

If this were to become a standard and the ftc were to make following it mandatory [1], the only sites that could still use behavioral advertising would be huge ones, possibly only google and facebook. Because third party advertising networks couldn't track users, only in-house systems like facebook's or google's (when applied to google) would be able to do it. This could lead to a big push towards consolidation and merging in a market that has historically been highly diverse and distributed, as small sites would get bought by larger sites with the goal of building an agglomeration large enough to do effective in-house behavioral advertising. This would make me sad.

How to fix this? The problem comes from using this "third party" distinction as an approximation of what users want. Users don't care whether they're being tracked on gmail by google's ad network or someone else's one. They care that some server is watching their online activity and deciding what ad to show based on what they've expressed interest in. A real solution would be to prohibit both first and third party tracking. Alternatively, we could decide we don't care.

[1] You could say that users would not be likely to turn "do not track" on in their browsers. I agree, they probably wouldn't, but I think browser companies would turn it on by default. Pop up blocking, another kind of advertising people found obnoxious, went from an opt-in thing to an opt-out thing after browser makers were convinced people would prefer it that way. I would expect this to follow the same path.

Comment via: facebook

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Trip Chaining, Redux

There’s been an ongoing conversation about how public transport can be used for non-work trips (and what it means for women) that makes me go back to something I wrote in 2012 about trip chaining. In that post I asserted a distinction between long and sho…

via Pedestrian Observations June 13, 2019

Unintended pregnancy in folk songs

I’ve been listening to a lot of the Watersons and Waterson:Carthy this week. It’s reminded me how absolutely full British folk music is of songs about unintended pregnancy. Most commonly the result is unhappy motherhood: “But if I had kent that I now ken …

via The whole sky June 1, 2019

Programmer migration patterns

I made a little flow chart of mainstream programming languages and how programmers seem to move from one to another. There's a more common kind of chart, which shows how the languages themselves evolved. I didn't want to show the point of view of …

via apenwarr March 18, 2019

via openring

More Posts:


  ::  Posts  ::  RSS  ::  ◂◂RSS  ::  Contact