• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Contra Caller Gender II

    October 28th, 2017
    contra, gender  [html]
    Dance weekends with two callers try to book ones of different genders. When the majority of callers were male this meant avoiding booking two men, but now that the majority is female it means avoiding booking two women.

    How can we know this? When I first looked into the gender breakdown of contra callers, in 2015, I used a small list of dance weekends where I had many years of data. I saw that a bit more than half of individual callers at those weekends over that ~20y period were male, and a bit under half the slots were called by women:

    n-female %-female
    Callers 40 41%
    Slots 125 47%

    We can see that they were gender balancing because male-female pairs happened much more often than you would expect by chance:

      ww: 10
      wm: 37
      mm: 10
    

    Using the data I published yesterday, we can see how things are now:

    n-female %-female
    Callers 2016 49 54%
    2017 54 53%
    Slots 2016 166 66%
    2017 160 60%

    The number of female callers has risen a lot, from 41% to 54%, and the overall number of slots called by women rose from 47% to 63%.

    Looking at weekends with exactly two callers I see:

    2016:
      ww: 16
      wm: 49
      mm: 8
    
    2017:
      ww: 15
      wm: 42
      mm: 8
    

    Since the overall number of slots called by women is 63% (326 out of 516, over two years) the most likely outcome for two-caller weekends would be: [1]

      ww: 40%
      wm: 47%
      mm: 13%
    
    but instead we're seeing:
      ww: 22%
      wm: 66%
      mm: 12%
    

    Organizers are still favoring male-female pairs, but because there are now more female callers than there used to be this now means booking extra men instead of extra women.

    (Bands still skew very heavily male, but I haven't counted since 2014 because that's a lot more work.)


    [1] These come from looking at how likely you are to get combinations events with 63% probability (booking a woman) or 37% probability (booking a man). Specifically:

      ww: 63% * 63% = 40%
      wm: 37% * 63% + 37% * 63% = 47%
      mm: 37% * 37% = 13%
    

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Learning Worst Industry Practices

    If I have a bad idea and you have a bad idea and we exchange them, we now have two bad ideas. But more than that. If I have a bad idea and you have a good idea and we exchange them, we should both land on your good idea – but that requires both […]

    via Pedestrian Observations September 20, 2020

    Collections: Iron, How Did They Make It? Part I, Mining

    This week we are starting a four-part look at pre-modern iron and steel production. As with our series on farming, we are going to follow the train of iron production from the mine to a finished object, be that a tool, a piece of armor, a simple nail, a w…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry September 18, 2020

    Learning Game

    I came up with this game. In the game one person thinks of something and then gives the other person a clue. And the other person writes a guess down on a blackboard or a piece of paper. Or really anything you have that's laying around that's av…

    via Lily Wise's Blog Posts September 17, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact