• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Contra Caller Gender II

    October 28th, 2017
    contra, gender  [html]
    Dance weekends with two callers try to book ones of different genders. When the majority of callers were male this meant avoiding booking two men, but now that the majority is female it means avoiding booking two women.

    How can we know this? When I first looked into the gender breakdown of contra callers, in 2015, I used a small list of dance weekends where I had many years of data. I saw that a bit more than half of individual callers at those weekends over that ~20y period were male, and a bit under half the slots were called by women:

    n-female %-female
    Callers 40 41%
    Slots 125 47%

    We can see that they were gender balancing because male-female pairs happened much more often than you would expect by chance:

      ww: 10
      wm: 37
      mm: 10
    

    Using the data I published yesterday, we can see how things are now:

    n-female %-female
    Callers 2016 49 54%
    2017 54 53%
    Slots 2016 166 66%
    2017 160 60%

    The number of female callers has risen a lot, from 41% to 54%, and the overall number of slots called by women rose from 47% to 63%.

    Looking at weekends with exactly two callers I see:

    2016:
      ww: 16
      wm: 49
      mm: 8
    
    2017:
      ww: 15
      wm: 42
      mm: 8
    

    Since the overall number of slots called by women is 63% (326 out of 516, over two years) the most likely outcome for two-caller weekends would be: [1]

      ww: 40%
      wm: 47%
      mm: 13%
    
    but instead we're seeing:
      ww: 22%
      wm: 66%
      mm: 12%
    

    Organizers are still favoring male-female pairs, but because there are now more female callers than there used to be this now means booking extra men instead of extra women.

    (Bands still skew very heavily male, but I haven't counted since 2014 because that's a lot more work.)


    [1] These come from looking at how likely you are to get combinations events with 63% probability (booking a woman) or 37% probability (booking a man). Specifically:

      ww: 63% * 63% = 40%
      wm: 37% * 63% + 37% * 63% = 47%
      mm: 37% * 37% = 13%
    

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Who Should Bear the Risk in Infrastructure Projects?

    The answer to the question is the public sector, always. It’s okay to have private-sector involvement in construction, but the risk must be borne by the public sector, or else the private sector will just want more money to compensate for the extra risk. …

    via Pedestrian Observations November 30, 2020

    Fireside Friday, November 27, 2020

    Hey folks! Fireside this week. A bit of a change-up in terms of the coming attractions. I had planned to start “Textiles, How Did They Make It?” next, but I want to do a bit more reading on some of the initial stages of textile production (that is, the pr…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry November 27, 2020

    Thoughts you mightn't have thunk about remote meetings

    Welcome to this week's edition of "building a startup in 2020," in which all your meetings are suddenly remote, and you probably weren't prepared for it. I know I wasn't. We started a "fully remote" company back in 2019, but …

    via apenwarr November 23, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact