• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Contra Caller Gender II

    October 28th, 2017
    contra, gender  [html]
    Dance weekends with two callers try to book ones of different genders. When the majority of callers were male this meant avoiding booking two men, but now that the majority is female it means avoiding booking two women.

    How can we know this? When I first looked into the gender breakdown of contra callers, in 2015, I used a small list of dance weekends where I had many years of data. I saw that a bit more than half of individual callers at those weekends over that ~20y period were male, and a bit under half the slots were called by women:

    n-female %-female
    Callers 40 41%
    Slots 125 47%

    We can see that they were gender balancing because male-female pairs happened much more often than you would expect by chance:

      ww: 10
      wm: 37
      mm: 10
    

    Using the data I published yesterday, we can see how things are now:

    n-female %-female
    Callers 2016 49 54%
    2017 54 53%
    Slots 2016 166 66%
    2017 160 60%

    The number of female callers has risen a lot, from 41% to 54%, and the overall number of slots called by women rose from 47% to 63%.

    Looking at weekends with exactly two callers I see:

    2016:
      ww: 16
      wm: 49
      mm: 8
    
    2017:
      ww: 15
      wm: 42
      mm: 8
    

    Since the overall number of slots called by women is 63% (326 out of 516, over two years) the most likely outcome for two-caller weekends would be: [1]

      ww: 40%
      wm: 47%
      mm: 13%
    
    but instead we're seeing:
      ww: 22%
      wm: 66%
      mm: 12%
    

    Organizers are still favoring male-female pairs, but because there are now more female callers than there used to be this now means booking extra men instead of extra women.

    (Bands still skew very heavily male, but I haven't counted since 2014 because that's a lot more work.)


    [1] These come from looking at how likely you are to get combinations events with 63% probability (booking a woman) or 37% probability (booking a man). Specifically:

      ww: 63% * 63% = 40%
      wm: 37% * 63% + 37% * 63% = 47%
      mm: 37% * 37% = 13%
    

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Austerity is Inefficient

    Working on an emergency timetable for regional rail has made it clear how an environment of austerity requires tradeoffs that reduce efficiency. I already talked about how the Swiss electronics before concrete slogan is not about not spending money but ab…

    via Pedestrian Observations February 27, 2021

    Fireside Friday, February 26, 2021

    Fireside this week, but next week we are diving into our long awaited series on pre-modern textile production, though we will be particularly focused on the most important clothing fibers in the Mediterranean world, wool and linen (rather than, say, silk …

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry February 26, 2021

    The Troubling Ethics of Writing (A Speech from Ancient Sumer)

    (Translated from a transcript of an ancient Sumerian speech by Uruk's most well-respected Scriptological Ethicist) Writing is a profoundly dangerous technology: Access to writing was initially, and still remains, uneven. What's worse, the rich are m…

    via BLOG - Cullen O'Keefe February 15, 2021

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact