• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • BIDA Compensation at Various Funding Levels

    December 14th, 2016
    contra, bida, money  [html]
    Everyone wants bands and callers to be paid well, and everyone wants dances to be cheap enough that they're accessible to all. These are kind of in tension: to pay people well you need more money. There are two ways out: get more people to come dancing, and people who can afford to contributing a little more. Let's see what this looks like for a typical dance.

    Here are the expenses for a representative dance with normal expenses, one caller, and three musicians:

    Hall $450
    Performers $400
    Sound $75
    Insurance $30
    Other $20
    Total $975

    This tells us that $975 is the break-even point. If BIDA takes in less than that we still pay our performers their $100/each, and BIDA loses money for the evening. If we make more than that BIDA keeps the first $100 in profit, and then any profit over $100 is split in equal shares among the performers and BIDA.

    On average we have about 122 paying dancers, plus some volunteers. Then we break even at an average contribution of $8. What happens if we get more or less than that? Our sliding scale is currently $5-$12, so let's look at the whole range:

    contribution pay per person bida profit/loss
    $5 $100 -$365
    $6 $100 -$243
    $7 $100 -$121
    $8 $100 $1
    $9 $105 $105
    $10 $129 $129
    $11 $153 $153
    $12 $178 $178

    Or, as a chart, with the average contribution ($7.87 [1]) shown as a vertical line:

    (BIDA "profit" doesn't actually go anywhere, since we're a nonprofit. Instead all the money eventually ends up covering something, generally losses from dances that have low attendance.)

    This means when people are generous at the door, BIDA can afford to cover its expenses and pay its performers well. Here's a histogram of average contributions:

    (I would love to show a histogram of contributions here, showing how people interpret the $5-$12 sliding scale, but collecting that data is a pain for the door volunteers.)

    At this rate BIDA loses a little money at each dance, and makes up for it when we have dances that are especially well attended.

    What if instead of looking at average contributions we looked at attendance? Let's assume everyone gives the average contribution, and look at a range of attendance numbers:

    attendance pay per person bida profit/loss
    90 $100 -$365
    100 $100 -$243
    110 $100 -$121
    120 $100 $1
    130 $105 $105
    140 $129 $129
    150 $153 $153
    160 $178 $178

    Here this is as a chart, with a vertical line at the average paid attendance of 122:

    These two charts looks surprisingly similar! They're both saying that right now BIDA typically loses a little bit of money, but if we could get attendance or contributions up by 25% to 152 people or $9.84/person, we could be regularly paying our performers 25% more, or $125. [2]

    So: if you would like to help BIDA pay performers better, bring your friends dancing, chip in a little more at the door if you can, or both!


    [1] Weirdly, the median is almost exactly the same, at $7.86.

    [2] An increase of 25% is the only place these numbers come out so nicely. At lower increases performer pay goes up by a lower percentage, while with a higher increase performer pay would go up by a larger percentage. Here's a table:

    increase in attendance or contributions increase in performer compensation
    5% 0%
    10% 0%
    15% 6%
    20% 15%
    25% 25%
    30% 35%
    35% 44%
    40% 54%
    45% 63%
    50% 73%

    Comment via: google plus, facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    What should we do about network-effect monopolies?

    Many large companies today are software monopolies that give their product away for free to get monopoly status, then do horrible things. Can we do anything about this?

    via benkuhn.net July 5, 2020

    More on the Deutschlandtakt

    The Deutschlandtakt plans are out now. They cover investment through 2040, but even beforehand, there’s a plan for something like a national integrated timetable by 2030, with trains connecting the major cities every 30 minutes rather than hourly. But the…

    via Pedestrian Observations July 1, 2020

    How do cars fare in crash tests they're not specifically optimized for?

    Any time you have a benchmark that gets taken seriously, some people will start gaming the benchmark. Some famous examples in computing are the CPU benchmark specfp and video game benchmarks. With specfp, Sun managed to increase its score on 179.art (a su…

    via Posts on Dan Luu June 30, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact