• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Automated Nomic

    January 2nd, 2019
    games, ideas, nomic
    Nomic is a game where you start with an initial rule set, and gameplay is all about modifying the rules. I've only played in person, with human rules interpreters, but I think an automated version built around GitHub pull requests and Continuous Integration could be interesting:
    • Instead of rules, there is the code in the repository and a CI system that runs it on pull requests.

    • On each person's turn, they submit a pull request, which then gets discussed and voted on via reviews.

    • Files are marked either mutable or immutable: PRs touching only mutable files can go in with majority approval, ones touching any immutable files need unanimous approval.

    • There are tests, and the CI system ensures PRs can only be submitted over failing tests with unanimous approval.

    • The CI determines if someone has won and declares the winner.

    • You start with a file listing the usernames, and some simple code which will keep score and end up declaring a winner ~10 turns in the future if nothing changes.

    • This isn't quite as flexible as traditional Nomic because some things can't be changed (PRs, the infra the CI runs on) but is still very flexible. On the other hand, because it's all computerized, you don't need to have a system of judging anymore.

    • If you wanted to be really fancy you could implement this all in Etherium and have a monetary reward, but that's enough more annoying to program that I'm not interested.

    Would this be fun? Would people be interested in playing if I put something together?

    Comment via: facebook

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    Interview with Kat Woods: decision-making about having kids

    Realizing what you don't want The post Interview with Kat Woods: decision-making about having kids appeared first on Otherwise.

    via Otherwise July 5, 2022

    Decision theory and dynamic inconsistency

    Here is my current take on decision theory: When making a decision after observing X, we should condition (or causally intervene) on statements like “My decision algorithm outputs Y after observing X.” Updating seems like a description of something you do…

    via The sideways view July 3, 2022

    10x (engineer, context) pairs

    Your actual output depends on a lot more than just how quickly you finish a given programming task. Everything besides the literal coding depends deeply on the way you interact with the organization around you.

    via benkuhn.net June 9, 2022

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact