• Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact

  • Abandoning Bottom-Posting

    February 16th, 2013
    tech, email  [html]
    I've always been taught it's polite to trim emails and type the reply below the text I'm responding to:
        Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
        > Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
        >> Top-posting.
        >>> What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
    
    But technology has changed. Mail readers used to show just a single message, but now they group related messages together. When you need to see the context of a reply you can look up and see past messages. Because you rarely need to look at quoted sections, they can be collapsed by default. [1] Email etiquette is all about being considerate of your reader, but now that tools have caught up with usage, top and bottom posting are equally easy to read.

    At this point bottom posting, unless you're responding inline, only serves to signal identity as someone who learned the ways of the old internet. Unfortunately it's a signal that few people will even see.

    Update 2013-02-17: Lots of discussion on hn.


    [1] Gmail is smart enough to collapse quoted sections only if you've already seen them. If you're added to a conversation in progress they're left in full for you to read.

    Comment via: google plus, facebook, hacker news

    Recent posts on blogs I like:

    The Limit of Circles in the Suburbs

    In dense urban cores, it’s valuable to run circular rail lines. They connect dense near-center neighborhoods to one another without going through the more congested center, and help make transferring between parallel lines more efficient, again through av…

    via Pedestrian Observations September 6, 2020

    Collections: Bread, How Did They Make It? Addendum: Rice!

    As an addendum on to our four-part look at the general structures of the farming of cereal grains (I, II, III, IV) this post is going to briefly discuss some of the key ways that the structures of rice farming differ from the structures of wheat and barle…

    via A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry September 4, 2020

    Notes on “Anthropology of Childhood” by David Lancy

    I read David Lancy’s “The Anthropology of Childhood: Cherubs, Chattel, and Changelings” and highlighted some passages. A lot of passages, it turns out. [content note: discussion of abortion and infanticide, including infanticide of children with disabilit…

    via The whole sky August 27, 2020

    more     (via openring)


  • Posts
  • RSS
  • ◂◂RSS
  • Contact