{"items": [{"author": "Andrew", "source_link": "https://www.facebook.com/jefftk/posts/618420622992?comment_id=618425622972", "anchor": "fb-618425622972", "service": "fb", "text": "Jeff, the problem you don't address is whether the information has any structure that a blog won't address. I'm not too familiar with blog user interfaces, but they tend to be pretty clumsy unless you want to read the latest thing or maybe search for a string<br><br>I know that google does well in some cases by throwing objects in a bag, and just using search strings (like the search engine) or maybe also applying some tags (like gmail).  But I'd think a web site might want a bit more human-imposed structure, if only to impose some order or other organization.  (Like yahoo?  ya, well...)<br><br>If you don't impose order (I don't mean \"not chaos,\" I mean ordinal order, a home page, a toc, or a map), a person would need to guess where to start and how to find a sensible path through the data.  Gee, that could be in a blog post.  But if you put your structure in a blog post, I think that's cheating.<br><br>The idea \"put dates on things\" solves some problems, but not all.  When does the information go stale?  Is the two-year-old blog post past its use-by date?  How do you know?<br><br>I guess I'm not convinced that a blog is a better answer to this question than a wiki is, not that I'm that fond of wiki toolsets, but the wiki tends to address the problem of content management and organization better than a blog.", "timestamp": "1372653385"}]}